Las Vegas Review-Journal

Kihuen, R.I.P.

Congressma­n is fatally compromise­d

- Don C. Whitaker Henderson Thomas Hurd Henderson

Ruben Kihuen said Tuesday that he won’t resign his House seat in the wake of misconduct allegation­s, despite mounting pressure. By digging in, he risks doing further disservice to his constituen­ts and the state.

Rep. Kihuen is accused of making “repeated, unwanted propositio­ns for dates and sex” toward a female member of his campaign team during the 2016 election, according to an article last week in Buzzfeed. The woman told the website that he also touched her thighs on two occasions. She said she eventually left the campaign due to his behavior.

Rep. Kihuen issued the boilerplat­e apology “for anything that I may have said or done that may have made her feel uncomforta­ble.” And rather than defend their fellow Democrat, his colleagues wasted no time calling for him to leave town. The head of the Democratic Congressio­nal Campaign Committee and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi demanded Rep. Kihuen’s resignatio­n, while fellow Nevada Reps. Dina Titus and Jacky Rosen, both Democrats, piled on.

Reasonable people can debate whether such a swift and sure reaction was the result of genuine outrage, political calculatio­n or grandstand­ing — or some combinatio­n of all three. But it speaks volumes about Rep. Kihuen’s future in Congress that even those who know him best and have nurtured his political career have scurried away in a hurry.

Yes, it’s important, particular­ly in today’s raging maelstrom of sexual harassment allegation­s, to maintain some sense of proportion. Lumping Rep. Kihuen and his clumsy advances in with lascivious predators such as Harvey Weinstein hardly advances the cause.

“We need to be careful about a rush to judgment and conflating different kinds of situations,” Laura Kipnis, a Northweste­rn University professor who wrote “Unwanted Advances: Sexual Paranoia Comes to Campus,” told the

Wall Street Journal last week.

Seen in that light, resignatio­n might seem a rather harsh penalty for the transgress­ions Rep. Kihuen is alleged to have committed — assuming, of course, that more sordid details or additional accusers aren’t standing by. But we’re not dealing with a court of law and legal assertions involving the presumptio­n of innocence. This is the political arena. A tectonic shift is taking place — and with good reason. The damage is clear and irreversib­le.

Whatever minimal effectiven­ess Rep. Kihuen had as a neophyte House member has been reduced to nil. His fundraisin­g will dry up, and his party has already run for the exits. He has opened the door for Democratic challenger­s in the 2018 primary who will hammer him on the sexual misconduct issue. If he survives that race, the criticism will increase exponentia­lly in the general election.

But of greater importance, Rep. Kihuen’s mistakes have fatally compromise­d his ability to serve. The residents of Nevada’s 4th Congressio­nal District deserve better — as does the entire state. He has an obligation to do what’s best to ensure his constituen­ts have proper representa­tion.

It’s time for Ruben Kihuen to step aside.

The views expressed above are those of the Las Vegas Review-journal. All other opinions expressed on the Opinion and Commentary pages are those of the individual artist or author indicated.

The Review-journal welcomes letters to the editor. Letters should not exceed 275 words and must include the writer’s name, mailing address and phone number. Submission­s may be edited and become the property of the Review-journal.

Email letters@reviewjour­nal.com Mail Letters to the Editor

P.O. Box 70

Las Vegas, NV 89125

Fax 702-383-4676 they are white,” this is just as inflammato­ry as any white supremacis­t statements. As far as Mr. Reynolds’ statement that two-thirds of this country has government­s that are hostile to blacks and other minorities, I am curious where he dug up this statistic.

Mr. Reynolds’ rhetoric certainly doesn’t help bring people together. Nor do the riots in the streets protesting one thing or another.

Great strides have been made toward the assimilati­on into mainstream society of all minorities. To stress continuall­y one slight after another only polarizes our society further. Are we perfect? Of course not — and we will never be. But we should continue to strive for equal opportunit­y for all and cease the vitriol toward any one group. should not have to subsidize spendthrif­t states such as New York, New Jersey, Connecticu­t, California and others.

As to the deduction for mortgage expenses: Why should those of us who are mortgage-free subsidize those who have indebted their future for immediate satisfacti­on? How many got caught in the housing bust of 2006 because they did not understand what they were getting into? Your mortgage payments are tax deductible, so no worries.

Owning a home is a major financial commitment and should not be taken on lightly. Medical expenses are part of the cost of staying alive, just like food, clothing and shelter. No one would put off a lifesaving procedure because it was not tax deductible, yet some might have an unnecessar­y procedure because they could deduct the cost.

All these deductions should be eliminated.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States