Senate immigration debate gets off to rocky start
WASHINGTON — A high-stakes Senate debate over immigration got off to a halting start Tuesday, with Republican and Democratic leaders immediately at loggerheads over how to move forward and President Donald Trump warning this was the “last chance” to extend protections for young immigrants in the country illegally.
Trump issued the warning in a morning tweet as the Senate opened what was billed as an unusual and open-ended debate on a host of immigration issues. Democrats had pushed for the debate, hopeful they might be able to craft a piece of legislation in real time on the Senate floor. But the experiment in legislating didn’t go very far.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch Mcconnell, R-KY., began the process by throwing his weight behind legislation based on the president’s priorities.
To kick the debate off, Mcconnell proposed allowing Republicans to bring up an amendment targeting cities that don’t fully cooperate with federal immigration authorities, socalled “sanctuary cities.” Then, Democrats would bring up legislation of their choosing. Amendments gaining 60 votes would become part of the broader immigration bill.
The Senate’s top Democrat, Chuck Schumer of New York, quickly objected.
“To begin the debate as the Republican leader suggests would be getting off on the wrong foot,” Schumer said. “Very partisan.”
Schumer wants Mcconnell to bring up legislation that incorporates President Donald Trump’s priorities and a second, much narrower bill from Sens. John Mccain, R-ariz., and Chris Coons, D-del.
His reasoning: The legislation should address the population of young immigrants that lawmakers from both parties say they want to help, rather than deal with side issues such as punishing sanctuary cities.
Mcconnell replied: “I’m not trying to dictate to them what they offer. They shouldn’t be trying to dictate to us what we offer. We ought to just get started.”
The disagreement pushed any immigration-related votes into Wednesday. That gives a group of moderate lawmakers more time to come up with a package that could generate 60 votes in the Senate.