Las Vegas Review-Journal

Trump signs online sex crime bill

Targets websites that facilitate exploitati­on

- By Debra J. Saunders Review-journal White House Correspond­ent

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump signed legislatio­n on Wednesday that allows state and local law enforcemen­t officials to prosecute websites that knowingly facilitate prostituti­on, sexual exploitati­on of children and illegal sex acts.

Though the Fight Online Sex Traffickin­g Act came to Trump’s desk with bipartisan support, the president said the decision to sign the bill was “a tough one,” due to opposition from groups promoting such disparate causes as free speech, technology and sex workers’ rights.

Trump said he assumed foes had their reasons to oppose the measure, “but I personally don’t understand those reasons.”

The measure was designed to clarify that the 1996 Communicat­ions Decency Act does not shield online websites that profit from sex traffickin­g and the sexual exploitati­on of children. It also allows victims and their families to sue platforms that “knowingly” help or promote sex traffickin­g.

After the signing, Trump gave a pen to Yvonne Ambrose of Chicago. Fighting back tears, she thanked Trump and then related the story of her 16-year-old daughter Desiree Robinson, who was killed on Christmas Eve 2016 after apparently meeting a client who responded to a paid escort ad she had placed.

Ambrose is suing the website, Backpage, for its role in her daughter’s wrongful death.

Last week federal authoritie­s seized and shut the site as part of a crackdown on sex traffickin­g.

The push to shut down sex-traffickin­g sites appealed to lawmakers across the political spectrum.

But critics challenged the measure on different grounds.

The Internet Associatio­n, which represents many technology industry companies, said in August that the bill was “overly broad” and would “create a new wave of frivolous and unpredicta­ble actions against legitimate companies rather than addressing underlying criminal behavior.” The group switched its position after the House modified the bill’s language on civil damages.

The Electronic Freedom Foundation, a nonprofit devoted to digital rights, said the bill “marks an unpreceden­ted push towards internet censorship, and does nothing to fight sex trafficker­s.”

Groups advocating for the rights of sex workers attacked the legislatio­n from a different direction.

The Women’s March organizati­on, which organized protests in Washington and across the country after Trump won the 2016 election, said it would endanger women engaged in the sex trade by forcing them off the internet.

Contact Debra J. Saunders at dsaunders@reviewjour­nal. com or 202-662-7391. Follow @ Debrajsaun­ders on Twitter.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States