Las Vegas Review-Journal

Water amency to appeal pipeline rulinm

Gn|ineer wants Court to overrule him

- By Henry Brean Las Vegas Review-journal

The Southern Nevada Water Authority will continue its push to pipe in water from across eastern Nevada.

Authority board members voted unanimousl­y Thursday to appeal a recent state engineer’s ruling that blocked the agency’s plans to one day pump groundwate­r from four valleys in Lincoln and White Pine counties.

Before the vote, water authority general manager John Enstminger said the controvers­ial project might not be needed for decades to come, but keeping it as an option is the prudent thing to do.

“Conservati­on is our community’s number one resource option,” he said.

Last month, State Engineer Jason King rejected the authority’s applicatio­ns for the valleys because of an earlier court ruling he said he dis- agreed with but was legally bound to follow.

That 2013 decision by Senior District Judge Robert Estes required the state engineer to recalculat­e and probably reduce how much water he had previously granted to the authority,inparttoen­surethatth­ewatertabl­e in the largest of the basins would eventually reach equilibriu­m despite large-scale groundwate­r pumping.

In the 111-page decision King issued on Aug. 17, he said that directive from the court left him no choice buttorejec­ttheauthor­ity’swater applicatio­ns, though he considered it “poor water policy for all Nevadans.”

Authority officials — and King — hope to see Estes’ ruling reversed as a result of the petition for judicial review approved by the board on Thursday.

King apparently feels so strongly

PIPELINE

about the matter that he also intends to file an appeal in which he will ask the court to throw out his own decision, said Joann Kittrell, spokeswoma­n for Nevada Department of Conservati­on and Natural Resources.

Thursday’s unanimous vote surprised some observers who had expected Clark County Commission­er Steve Sisolak to break ranks with his fellow water authority board members after he recently voiced opposition to the pipeline project.

But Sisolak said his vote was about clearing up a legal dispute over state groundwate­r policy, not about his feelings regarding the pipeline itself.

“I have serious reservatio­ns about this project,” Sisolak said. “I’m not convinced this would solve our water problems in and of itself.”

Instead of a multibilli­on-dollar pipeline that might damage the environmen­t and not produce that much water, Sisolak said he would prefer to see the authority invest in ocean desalinati­on plants along the Pacific Coast in exchange for more water from the Colorado River.

“We’re not going to run out of salt water,”hesaid.

Sisolak is the Democratic candidate for governor, and if he wins in November, he could end up appointing Nevada’s next state engineer. King has announced plans to retire early next year.

Asked how his feelings about the pipeline project might play into a gubernator­ial appointmen­t like that, Sisolak said he didn’t want to speculate.

Las Vegas water officials have been been pursuing the pipeline from eastern Nevada since 1989, when they startled rural residents with a surprise mass filing for billions of

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States