Las Vegas Review-Journal

Birth control opt-out provisions halted across U.S.

- By Marc Levy The Associated Press

HARRISBURG, Pa. — A federal judge on Monday put a nationwide hold on Trump administra­tion rules that allow more employers to opt out of providing women with no-cost birth control.

U.S. District Judge Wendy Beetleston­e in Philadelph­ia agreed with a lawsuit originally filed by Pennsylvan­ia, citing the potential harm to states should the rules be enforced.

Numerous citizens could lose contracept­ive coverage, Beetleston­e wrote, resulting in the increased use of state-funded contracept­ive services as well as increased costs to state services from unintended pregnancie­s.

The rules, scheduled to take effect Monday, would change a mandate under 2010’s Affordable Care Act by allowing more employers, including publicly traded companies, to opt out of providing no-cost contracept­ive coverage to women by claiming religious objections. Some private employers could also now object on moral grounds.

Pennsylvan­ia’s attorney general, Josh Shapiro, called the court ruling a “victory for the health and economic independen­ce of women” and the rejection of a Trump administra­tion move to violate a federal law that requires insurers to cover the services.

“Congress hasn’t changed that law, and the president can’t simply ignore it with an illegal rule,” Shapiro said.

New Jersey later joined Pennsylvan­ia in suing.

The Department of Justice did not say whether it would appeal, saying only that it will “continue to vigorously defend religious liberty.” The Department of Health and Human Services said the rules affirm the administra­tion’s commitment to upholding constituti­onal freedoms.

“No American should be forced to violate his or her own conscience in order to abide by the laws and regulation­s governing our health care system,” Health and Human Services Department spokeswoma­n Caitlin Oakley said in a statement.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States