Las Vegas Review-Journal

Whistling right past the Green New Deal

- By L. Brent Bozell III and Tim Graham Creators Syndicate

Abold new crew of radicals swept into Congress to remake environmen­tal policies, and the news media immediatel­y called out their poisonous and extreme proposals.

If you’re thinking about this freshman class of knucklehea­ds who has given us the 2019 Green New Deal, the answer is no. We’re not talking about them.

We’re talking 1995, when Newt Gingrich and Co. took over the House. They were the nuts. And, by God, were they dangerous!

ABC’S Peter Jennings narrated a promo on July 9 of that year, saying: “Next week on ABC’S ‘World News Tonight,’ a series of reports about our environmen­t which will tell you precisely what the new Congress has in mind: the most frontal assault on the environmen­t in 25 years. Is this what the country wants?”

That’s not subtle. It’s as if the Republican­s wrote legislatio­n to poison the air and water and execute all the endangered species.

Jennings wasn’t alone. Nbcnewswas­surewewere all going to die. It offered a competing promo on July

17: “Safe food, safe water, safe air, safe transporta­tion: You have this protection now, but you might be about to lose it. Why? Watch a special In Depth report on ‘NBC Nightly News’ tomorrow.”

Who needs paid political advertisem­ents with the “news” networks offering free commercial­s like this?

Now the socialists are runningthe­showatthed­nc, and to say they’re not ready for prime time is an understate­ment. Theirs are policies grade schoolers might love. So are the media at all concerned?

When leftist radicals in Congress led by Sen. Ed Markey and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-cortez held a press conference on Feb. 7 pushing their Green New Deal, for once there were no nightly news stories on ABC or CBS or NBC. Even they were ashamed. They’ve been promoting AOC for months … and now this?

These radicals called for building “high-speed rail at a scale where air travel stops becoming necessary,” as a now-removed blog post of frequently asked questions released by Ocasio-cortez’s office said. Because instead one could take the train to Guatemala? Brazil? Mongolia? This was no typo.

“We set a goal to get to net-zero, rather than zero emissions, in 10 years because we aren’t sure that we’ll be able to fully get rid of farting cows and airplanes that fast,” the post said.

This was not an elaborate April Fools’ Day prank. This was a sincere proclamati­on of a radical agenda.

How to get out of this mess? Saikat Chakrabart­i, chief of staff to Ocasio-cortez, arrived at a solution as incoherent as the proposals. Ol’ Saikat tweeted: “An early draft of a FAQ that was clearly unfinished and that doesn’t represent the GND resolution got published to the website by mistake.”

So the first draft was idiotic. How could a polished proposal based on these inanities be any better?

But Ocasio-cortez had an even more ridiculous explanatio­n. She claimed there were “doctored” versions floating around the internet.

It’s so nice to be a Democrat with today’s network-news environmen­t. No ABC or NBC anchor will narrate a commercial sternly warning, “Air travel. A cheeseburg­er. A glass of milk. You may have them today, but you may be about to lose them! Is this what the country wants?”

L. Brent Bozell III is the president of the Media Research Center. Tim Graham is director of media analysis at the Media Research Center and executive editor of the blog Newsbuster­s.org.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States