Taking foreign dirt grounds for debate
Dems slam Trump for research remarks
WASHINGTON — The fallout from President Donald Trump’s apparent willingness to accept dirt on a political opponent, even if it came from Russia, reverberated Thursday through Capitol Hill.
During her weekly press conference, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi saw the remarks as proof Trump “does not know right from wrong.”
Pelosi was reacting to Trump’s comments on ABC
News after anchor George Stephanopoulos asked Trump what he would want his campaign to do if Russia or China offered dirt on opponents.
“I think I’d take it,” Trump answered. He added he might go to the FBI, but he didn’t think the FBI had enough agents to deal with such issues. He added when it comes to accepting opposition research, “they all do it.” Upon further consideration, Trump offered that he might “do both” — first learn what the derogatory information might be, but then call the FBI.
When Stephanopoulos mentioned that FBI Director Christopher Wray, whom Trump appointed, said candidates should call the FBI if a foreign country offered dirt on an opponent, the president responded, “the FBI director is wrong.”
“The president has given Russia the green light to interfere in the 2020 election,” Sen. Mark Warner, D-VA., responded on Twitter.
Report foreign offers
On Thursday, Warner took to the floor to urge colleagues to pass his Foreign Influence Reporting in Elections Act, which would make it a legal duty to report a foreign power’s offers of assistance to the FBI.
Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., agreed that foreign influence on U.S. elections is a problem.
But Graham, a frequent golfing buddy of the president, then put a different spin on the controversy: “Finally, the outrage some of my Democratic colleagues are raising about President Trump’s comments will hopefully be met with equal outrage that their own party hired a foreign national to do opposition research on President Trump’s campaign and that information, unverified, was apparently used by the FBI to obtain a warrant against an American citizen.”
Graham was referring to Hillary Clinton 2016 campaign and the Democratic Party’s financing of former British intelligence official Christopher Steele, who put together a “dossier” on alleged Russian compromising material on Trump.
The Trump campaign did not get opposition research directly from Russian actors, according to special counsel Robert Mueller’s report.
Still, some have argued Donald Trump Jr. and other top aides broke the law when they met with a Russian lawyer with ties to the Kremlin in Trump Tower in July 2016.
Can words be contributions?
In 2017, Common Cause filed a complaint that argued the Trump Tower meeting constituted an illegal solicitation. “Federal campaign finance law defines ‘contribution’ to include anything of value given for the purpose of influencing a federal election. And federal law prohibits any person from soliciting or receiving a