Las Vegas Review-Journal

Taxpayers associatio­n: Union tax hikes a bad idea

-

If there’s one issue that unifies Democrats, it’s the desire to impose higher taxes to sate an ever-growing federal leviathan.

Taxes, of course, have played a major role in the race for the party’s 2020 presidenti­al nomination. The various candidates propose a host of new giveaways that would require the creation of massive new bureaucrac­ies and healthier “revenue streams” supported by the “rich” and middle class.

This enthusiasm for other people’s money infects local Democratic activists, too.

Last month, the Clark County Education Associatio­n, which has endorsed socialist Bernie Sanders in Saturday’s Democratic presidenti­al caucuses, announced plans to qualify two initiative­s for the 2022 ballot intended to raise $1.1 billion for public education. The first proposal would increase the gaming tax on large casinos; the second would jack Clark County’s sales tax to nearly 10 percent, making it one of the highest in the country.

If the union gathers the requisite signatures by November, the matter would go to the Legislatur­e in 2021. If lawmakers punt, voters will decide the issue the following year.

And just as the spending plans put forth by many of the Democratic hopefuls would require higher levies on those of modest means, the union’s proposal would hit Clark County’s less fortunate residents hard, particular­ly when it comes to the regressive sales tax.

As expected, the gaming industry (full disclosure: the family of Las Vegas Sands Corp. chairman Sheldon Adelson owns the Review-journal) and the Las Vegas Chamber have announced their opposition to the union gambit. And last week, another influentia­l group weighed in.

“Taken together, these proposals represent an annual increase of 28 percent to the $4.5 billion in general fund revenue forecast for the 2020 fiscal year,” the Nevada Taxpayers Associatio­n noted. “It is the view of the NTA that a tax increase of this size, without the appropriat­e performanc­e benchmarks, does not serve the best interests of our state.”

Particular­ly notable is the associatio­n’s reference to “appropriat­e performanc­e benchmarks.” Indeed, the teachers union demands that Nevada taxpayers hand over their wallets without any concern for whether this enormous influx of revenue for the public schools leads to improvemen­t in the state’s dismal academic rankings. To make matters worse, legislativ­e Democrats have spent the past five years reversing accountabi­lity measures that were tied to the $1.3 billion tax package lawmakers passed in 2015 to boost education funding.

Voters should be highly skeptical that Democratic candidates can hand out their goody bags without imposing large tax hikes on the middle class. Nevadans should likewise resist the idea of rewarding the state education establishm­ent with billions in new funding absent safeguards designed to boost achievemen­t levels.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States