Las Vegas Review-Journal

Owners unclear on rules policing

Agencies vary on compliance

- By Mike Shoro Las Vegas Review-journal

This much is clear: Nevada business owners must enforce a rigid set of rules inside their establishm­ents if they want to reopen — or stay reopened — under the governor’s Phase One pandemic economic recovery plan.

As deemed by Gov. Steve Sisolak, a business must have employees and customers practice social distancing, operate at a maximum of half capacity and require employees to wear face coverings.

“While the majority of our businesses are doing a great job,” Sisolak said at a Friday news conference, “we know that there are some that are not in compliance right now. Unfortunat­ely, their negligence puts Nevadans at risk,

and so there will be repercussi­ons.”

But what isn’t clear is how those repercussi­ons are playing out.

The Phase One reopening directive left enforcemen­t to a variety of agencies as they see fit. But no two agencies are enforcing compliance the same way, leading to different penalties for the same infraction and different ways of keeping tabs on businesses.

Inspectors with the city of Las Vegas and the cosmetolog­y board are visiting businesses daily to check for compliance. Meanwhile, OSHA and the city of North Las Vegas are waiting for complaints or referrals to come to their attention before dispatchin­g inspectors.

North Las Vegas spokesman Patrick Walker said this approach is in response to businesses thus far being “very compliant” with the directive. The city had received just two complaints as of Thursday.

There would “probably” be more complaints if people knew where to complain, though people’s first instinct is often to call the police, who would have to pass the informatio­n along to the appropriat­e agency, said William Sousa, the director of UNLV’S Center for Crime and Justice Policy.

‘Nobody told me’

Nevada’s businesses generally understand what’s expected of them and that people and competitor­s can snitch on them if they’re breaking the rules, said Randi Thompson, the state director of the National Federation of Independen­t Business.

Henderson business owner Michele Walker said she assumes she could be on the receiving end of a complaint if a customer catches her without a face mask or disobeying another part of the directive.

But Walker said Thursday she didn’t know what specific penalties her business, Imaginatio­ns Unlimited, 19 S. Water St., could face.

“Nobody told me anything” about penalties, and she said she assumed the authoritie­s would simply close her shop.

In practice, penalties vary by agency.

Based on interviews and informatio­n from multiple enforcemen­t agencies, the most common response to a business not following the rules appears to be a verbal warning or some form of education.

North Las Vegas violators can face fines of up to $1,000 a day, license revocation or even misdemeano­r charges that could land someone in jail for up to six months, Walker, the city spokesman, said.

OSHA can levy a fine up to a hefty $13,494 if a business doesn’t follow the governor’s directive or OSHA’S conjunctiv­e COVID-19 rules, an OSHA spokeswoma­n said.

For Las Vegas, penalties are determined on a case-by-case basis, Las Vegas spokesman Jace Radke said.

The city typically first reminds a business owner of the rules and asks them to address the violation. If problems persist, Radke said, the city may fine a business or suspend its license.

It’s unclear if any business has yet received a fine or license suspension for flouting the reopening rules. It’s also unclear how long it might take for a business to be reprimande­d.

Clark County Commission­er Marilyn Kirkpatric­k, who sits on an advisory panel tasked with helping businesses reopen, said Friday that enforcemen­t has been “effective.”

“All agencies agreed that our first method would be to educate folks,” she said. “Nobody is trying to go out and fine everybody first. That’s the last thing we’re trying to do. We’re trying to help them.”

The difference in penalties are to to be expected across different jurisdicti­ons, she said.

Complaints

Henderson and the Nevada Board of Cosmetolog­y each indicated some salons have struggled with the social distancing requiremen­ts. Noncomplia­nt salon owners in Henderson didn’t understand customers couldn’t wait in the lobbies and couldn’t take walk-ins, city spokeswoma­n Kathleen Richards said.

She said compliance issues are limited, though the city isn’t closely tracking data, in part because some complaints are doubled up, secondhand or reported via different channels.

“I think most businesses, once they’ve been visited by us, have been very understand­ing,” Richards said.

Of 24 complaints from May 9 to Thursday received by the cosmetolog­y board, at least two of those were meritless and nine were addressed through education, compliance coordinato­r Leah Easter said.

Las Vegas received 28 complaints between May 8 and Tuesday, Radke said. The city has received several calls about salons, smoking lounges and employees not wearing masks, he said.

In Clark County, officials had received 40 complaints as of Tuesday about businesses not following the governor’s directive, spokesman Dan Kulin said.

Also through Tuesday, the Nevada Occupation­al Safety and Health Administra­tion had received 10 noncomplia­nce complaints under Phase One. Eight of those were from Southern Nevada. Spokeswoma­n Teri Williams said further details about those complaints were confidenti­al.

Bodies

Sisolak said Friday the “vast majority” of businesses are complying with the reopening guidelines.

But, an agency can’t address a specific violation it doesn’t know exists, said UNLV’S Sousa. Licensing boards and government­s rely on complaints, tips or proactive checks to find such a problem, he said.

“Are there going to be some that don’t come to the attention (of an agency)? Sure, but the most serious ones are most likely” to draw complaints, Sousa said.

On some level, Sousa said, it’s up to the businesses to police themselves.

Part of that stems from the fact there are far fewer inspectors than there are businesses, Sousa said. Accordingl­y, cities and regulation boards must be choosy with their enforcemen­t efforts.

As a police officer patrols known crime “hot spots” rather than random neighborho­ods or streets, Sousa analogized, an inspector visits the businesses that could be highest at risk for a violation.

“Very rarely is it this random, ‘Let’s check this business out of the hell of it,’” Sousa said.

Contact Mike Shoro at mshoro@ reviewjour­nal.com or 702-387-5290. Follow @mike_shoro on Twitter.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States