Las Vegas Review-Journal

One Western state still craves coal

- Dustin Bleizeffer Dustin Bleizeffer is a contributo­r to Writers on the Range, writersont­herange.org, a nonprofit dedicated to spurring lively conversati­on about the West. He has worked as a coal miner, an oilfield mechanic, and for 22 years as a reporter

As the rest of the West rushes to meet increasing­ly ambitious goals to reduce carbon emissions, one state is moving in exactly the opposite direction. It’s Wyoming, which even wants to take on the coal-fired generation that states such as Oregon and Washington are abandoning.

Wyoming residents and businesses enjoy among the lowest rates for electricit­y because most of the state’s power comes from burning coal, but those cost dynamics are changing quickly, making coal a liability.

Recently, a legislativ­e committee advanced a bill to raise taxes on wind energy while also signaling distaste for rooftop solar and other forms of customer-generated electricit­y. It seems a perplexing stance in the context of other states in the West that are retiring coal-fired power plants at a rapid clip.

But Wyoming leaders worry little about the devastatio­n in the West wrought by climate change, and they criticize Pacificorp, which proposes to retire several coal-fired units ahead of schedule, for potentiall­y harming Wyoming towns such as Kemmerer, Rock Springs and Glenrock.

Unlike Colorado, New Mexico and Washington, Wyoming has never developed a plan to transition beyond coal. Instead, state leaders are trying to force utilities to keep aging coal plants burning. The state is also spending taxpayer dollars in a stealth effort to lobby against coal-plant closures outside its borders, in Arkansas, Oklahoma, Colorado and other states.

Meanwhile, Wyoming is negotiatin­g to take on the coal power within Pacificorp’s operating region that other Western states are abandoning. That means Wyoming ratepayers — or a combinatio­n of customers in Wyoming and other states that might opt for more coal — would take on a larger coal portfolio. This could be risky financiall­y, as the coal generation comes from older power plants, some beyond 40 and 50 years old.

Somehow, lawmakers have convinced themselves that the West’s rush to renewables is foolish and will result in a knock on the door from other states. Then Wyoming could say, “I told you so” to these states that plead for coal-fired power after wind and solar fail to meet spikes in demand.

“Reliabilit­y is a big concern for customers,” said Bryce Freeman, Wyoming’s consumer advocate administra­tor in testimony before a legislativ­e committee last fall. “The cheapest electricit­y in the world is no good if it doesn’t work when customers need it, and that’s exactly what’s happened in California.”

Well, not exactly. There were forced rolling blackouts in California last summer, but the cause was more operationa­l shortcomin­gs. A report by the California Independen­t System Operator found that power officials failed to anticipate and contract for enough backup power while also mistakenly keeping offline some of its backup from natural gas.

It seems a shame that the state isn’t onboard with its Western neighbors to help decarboniz­e the grid. “The more people and states that participat­e, the easier it is to achieve any emissions goal,” said Jonathan Koomey, energy and climate researcher at the University of California, Berkeley. “If you have more geographic regions contributi­ng to the grid, it makes it easier to reduce emissions.”

Anybody who has traveled the I-80 corridor across southern Wyoming knows that the state has an incredible wind resource. It even blows in the evening when customers in California need it most. There’s now a glut of potential Wyoming wind energy proposals from developers that would produce more than 5,000 megawatts with a capital investment of nearly $10 billion. It’s worth noting that no other industry is contemplat­ing such an investment in Wyoming, now in the throes of a historic budget crisis. Financial backers, though, are nervous, warning that the threat of higher state taxes on wind might make Wyoming noncompeti­tive.

When the state Legislatur­e took comment from close to 100 people about the state’s coal-only agenda last month, most residents pleaded with lawmakers not to block commercial wind power developmen­t. Lawmakers weren’t swayed.

The wind blows and the sun shines in other parts of the West, too, and the burgeoning renewable market might just blow past Wyoming. Its stubborn reluctance won’t stop other Western states from leaving coal — and perhaps the Cowboy State — in the past.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States