Las Vegas Review-Journal

RIGHT-WING MEDIA FANNING FLAMES OF FALSE HOPE

-

turning the Nation’s Election Results?” Tuesday, the site proclaimed in one of its top stories: “BREAKING: Nevada GOP Electors Cast Ballot for Trump, There Are Now Dueling Electors in Three States.”

On a podcast hosted by Trump’s former White House chief strategist, Steve Bannon, a conservati­ve activist vowed to file a new lawsuit seeking to reverse the electors’ vote — adding to the dozens of suits so far, nearly all of which have been dismissed. “Intimidati­on and fear is not something that works in a democracy,” said Phill Kline, the director of the conservati­ve Amistad Project, vowing to continue the fight.

The podcast was one of at least six on the list of Apple’s 100 most popular podcasts that are hosted by someone who has been vocally supportive of Trump’s attack on the nation’s electoral system.

The world seems to have recognized what the Electoral College affirmed on Monday: Trump will be leaving office whether he wants to accept his fate or not. The Supreme Court refused to second-guess this reality on Friday when it rejected a legally dubious, last-minute maneuver by the state of Texas. Numerous world leaders — Russia’s Vladimir Putin, among them — have accepted it by congratula­ting Biden. Even Trump’s own administra­tion eventually bowed and agreed to formally begin the transition process.

Yet six weeks after his defeat, the aggressive campaign by Trump and his media boosters to insist with each new setback that the election is far from settled isn’t letting up.

Inside this bubble, the president’s allies present virtually impossible outcomes as completely plausible. They raise expectatio­ns of victory in unwinnable lawsuits and battles over electors that state legislator­s are unwilling to wage. They bolster the credibilit­y of questionab­le witnesses and advocates whose most important qualificat­ion is an unequivoca­l conviction that Trumpwon in November, despite all available evidence.

And then when they don’t meet the bar they set, they move it.

This is what the president’s senior adviser, Stephen Miller, demonstrat­ed on Monday when he insisted in an interview on “Fox & Friends” that the Electoral College vote was largely irrelevant because all that truly mattered was Inaugurati­on Day, Jan. 20.

“So we have more than enough time to right the wrong of this fraudulent election result and certify Donald Trump as the winner,” Miller said, resetting the calendar to another scheme to invalidate the votes of millions of Americans, because the previous try had flopped.

Some allies of Trump had hoped the Electoral College vote would end with a different outcome: that Republican legislator­s in six battlegrou­nd states would name slates of electors favorable to Trump. Late last week, a coalition of leaders affiliated with the Tea Party, conservati­ve political organizati­ons and social conservati­ve groups wrote an open letter urging activists to “begin mobilizing immediatel­y to contact their state legislator­s, as well as their representa­tives in the House and Senate, to demand that clean slates of electors be appointed.”

The upheaval failed to materializ­e and the electors cast their votes on Monday without incident. The few instances of resistance by Republican­s were muted and entirely symbolic.

All along, Trump-friendly media personalit­ies like Mark Levin, who hosts one of the most popular talk radio shows in the country, have led their audiences to believe that it was possible to pressure state lawmakers to reject Biden’s victory. They have often based their confidence on the wild accusation­s of people with political motives and diminished credibilit­y.

Levin, along with Rush Limbaugh and Bannon, was one of the first to give a national platform to the conspiracy theories of the lawyers Lin Wood and Sidney Powell, whose various claims of fraud involve a multinatio­nal network of saboteurs and domestic enemies of the president both dead (Hugo Chávez of Venezuela) and alive (“Never Trump” Republican officials).

In an interview with Levin on Nov. 10, for instance, Wood called for the Biden electors to be replaced in a special session of Georgia’s legislatur­e “so they can elect the electors to vote for Donald Trump.” He then falsely claimed that Trump not only won the state by “a landslide” but also won the national popular vote with 70% support.

On their own, comments as outlandish as these might not rise to become as widely accepted as they are now among Trump’s base. But the hosts validated them beyond just giving them a platform. They vouched for the profession­al credibilit­y of the lawyers.

Though Powell’s list of conspirato­rs and crimes committed against the president grew too bizarre even for the Trump campaign — it disavowed her in a statement on Nov. 22 — the proTrump media continued to give her a friendly platform.

On Monday, with Biden’s victory about to be ratified by the electors, the Gateway Pundit posted an item about an interview she had done with The Epoch Times, another major purveyor of pro-trump misinforma­tion. Powell claimed in passing that “one of our experts” discovered how Dominion voting machines had manufactur­ed tallies that led to “5% higher votes for Biden across the board, everywhere.”

Powell has also appeared recently on other more mainstream pro-trump new outlets like Fox Business, where Lou Dobbs interviewe­d her last week.

Far-fetched tales of vast, subversive networks of infiltrato­rs have a long history in the Republican Party. Powell’s claims that Cuba, Venezuela and China are behind a plot to install rigged voting machines in the United States have echoes of the anti-communist paranoia that was promoted in the 1960s by the John Birch Society and Phyllis Schlafly, considered by many to be the matriarch of the conservati­ve movement.

Yochai Benkler, a professor at Harvard Law School who helped write “Network Propaganda,” a study on the right-wing media’s influence on politics, said the difference between the days of the John Birch Society and today was a matter of scale. “What you didn’t get then was the same market exposure,” he said. “You didn’t have tens of millions of voters exposed.”

And the fringe never, of course, enjoyed the support of the sitting president.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States