Las Vegas Review-Journal

School Board opposes trustee appointmen­ts

It OKS resolution as lawmakers eye changes

- By Aleksandra Appleton Contact Aleksandra Appleton at 702-383-0218 or aappleton@ reviewjour­nal.com. Follow @aleksapple­ton on Twitter.

The Clark County School Board passed a resolution Thursday night opposing changes to how trustees are selected, as the rumblings of appointmen­ts continue in the Legislatur­e.

Two bills have been proposed this session that would allow municipali­ties to appoint some members of the school boards of Nevada’s largest school districts, in Clark and Washoe counties, creating a hybrid model to replace the current all-elected model.

A bill sponsored by Assembly Speaker Jason Frierson, D-las Vegas, would leave four members of the seven-person board elected while allowing the county commission and two most populous cities in each county to each select a member.

An earlier bill by Sen. Ben Kieckhefer, R-reno, instead called for four appointmen­ts, leaving three trustees elected.

The board’s statement of opposition says the citizens of Clark County “should be allowed to determine the qualificat­ions and elect the Trustees,” rather than other government­al entities.

It also raises concerns that the proposals would dilute the influence

of the people, leaving some regions underrepre­sented.

Trustee Lola Brooks said she was aware of the public’s perception of the board, which has veered negative during the year of school shutdowns and reopenings amid the COVID-19 pandemic.

“We actually have more that binds us together than keeps us apart, and sometimes people don’t get to see that,” Brooks said.

Trustee Danielle Ford said, “Whatever the public thinks about their representa­tive trustees, I think they deserve the right to have that representa­tion.”

The School Board also heard a slate of public comments from elementary school specialist­s — music, art and

Danielle Ford

library teachers — who said they felt discounted as profession­als under school schedules that require them to supervise other teachers’ classes.

Specialist­s said that by covering classes for other teachers, they not only took on additional possible exposure to COVID-19 but didn’t have the opportunit­y to teach their specialty to all their students.

A Feb. 11 amendment to the district’s agreement with the Clark County Education Associatio­n was meant to address these concerns by requiring higher-up approval to any school’s plan requiring teachers to supervise more than four different classes — but teachers said the provision was not being met.

“Our children need more than just babysittin­g; they need the passion of the arts and music and the pure joy of reading in a library,” said CCEA Vice President Jim Frazee, speaking in support of specialist­s. “That’s what makes the basis for a good education. That’s what makes the basis for a good human being and a member of society.”

In a statement after the meeting, the school district said it is in compliance with the terms of the agreement with the teachers union and remains in “constant contact with all employee bargaining units and committed to addressing the concerns of all employees.”

“The value and enrichment that our Specialist­s bring to classrooms keep students engaged and broadens their learning experience,” the statement said. “In developing plans to safely open schools, the District has worked to limit the number of employees moving between classrooms. The plans were designed to reduce the number of students and employees required to quarantine in the event of a positive case on a campus.”

 ??  ?? Ben Kieckhefer
Ben Kieckhefer
 ??  ?? Jason Frierson
Jason Frierson
 ??  ?? Lola Brooks
Lola Brooks

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States