Las Vegas Review-Journal

Voters like Biden infrastruc­ture plan; GOP sees opening on taxes

- By Jim Tankersley, Ben Casselman and Emily Cochrane

President Joe Biden’s $2.3 trillion infrastruc­ture plan has yet to win over a single Republican in Congress, but it is broadly popular with voters nationwide, mirroring the dynamics of the $1.9 trillion economic aid bill that Biden signed into law last month.

The infrastruc­ture proposal garners support from 2 in 3 Americans, and from 7 in 10 independen­t voters, in polling for The New York Times by the online research firm Surveymonk­ey. Three in 10 Republican respondent­s support the plan, which features spending on roads, water pipes, the electrical grid, care for older and disabled Americans and a range of efforts to shift to low-carbon energy sources.

That support is essentiall­y unchanged from a month ago, when Surveymonk­ey polled voter opinions on a hypothetic­al $2 trillion Biden infrastruc­ture package, despite Republican attacks since the president outlined his American Jobs Plan in Pittsburgh at the end of March. And there is near-unanimous support for the plan from Democrats, whose confidence in the nation’s economic recovery has surged in the first months of Biden’s administra­tion.

“What we’ve seen with all our polling so far this year is that these proposals that the Biden administra­tion has been rolling out have met with widespread approval,” said Laura Wronski, a research scientist at Surveymonk­ey.

Republican leaders hope they can ultimately turn some voters, particular­ly independen­ts, against the plan by attacking Biden’s proposal to fund it with tax increases on corporatio­ns. Those increases include raising the corporate income tax rate to 28% from 21% and a variety of measures meant to force multinatio­nal corporatio­ns to pay more in tax to the

The infrastruc­ture proposal garners support from 2 in 3 Americans, and from 7 in 10 independen­t voters, in polling by Surveymonk­ey.

United States on profits they earn or book abroad.

Senior Republican­s in Congress are eager to wage that fight, arguing that voters will sour on even popular spending provisions if they are offset by tax increases that could chill investment and economic growth. They have cast the corporate tax cuts that then-president Donald Trump signed into law in 2017 as a boon for the economy that would be catastroph­ic to reverse.

“Infrastruc­ture’s popular,” Sen. Mitch Mcconnell of Kentucky, the Republican leader, told reporters this week. “We need to have an infrastruc­ture bill as big as we’re willing to credibly pay for without going back and undoing the 2017 tax bill.”

Biden’s aides are similarly convinced that turning voter attention to corporate taxes — and to the 2017 tax cuts, which have never polled as well as Biden’s spending ambitions — will only help them solidify their case to the public. They cast the tax increases in his plan as a necessary corrective to that law, which they say rewarded corporatio­ns without producing the investment boom Republican­s promised, and as the right way to offset popular spending programs.

The Republican case against corporate tax increases “doesn’t fit this economic moment,” said Heather Boushey, a member of the White House Council of Economic Advisers. “People have learned that there’s only so low you can go. And if the tax system allows America’s most profitable companies to not have to pay their fair share, that’s not in the national interest, and it’s certainly not in the interest of American workers.”

Public support for the infrastruc­ture plan is not quite as overwhelmi­ng as it was for Biden’s first major piece of legislatio­n, the $1.9 trillion stimulus package that sent $1,400 checks to most Americans. That bill won the support of 72% of Americans, including 43% of Republican­s, in a February poll, also conducted by Surveymonk­ey.

But support for the infrastruc­ture plan is broad-based. The proposal draws majority approval from adults across virtually every social and demographi­c category: men and women, young and old, college-educated and not.

Individual components of the plan are even more popular. Sixty-seven percent of respondent­s said they supported increased federal spending on mass transit; 78% supported spending on airports and waterways, and on improving broadband internet access; and 84% supported money for highways and bridges. The latter two categories won majority approval even from Republican­s.

“Republican­s don’t support the American Jobs Plan overall, but there are some elements of it that they actually love,” Wronski said.

The Times survey did not ask about other components of Biden’s plan, such as those focusing on the environmen­t, health care and education. But other polls have generally found support for those proposals as well, although in some cases by narrower margins.

Biden has said he would pay for the bulk of his plan by partly reversing the corporate tax cuts passed by his predecesso­r, and most polls routinely show that the public favors raising taxes on large corporatio­ns.

But there may be room for the Republican­s’ tax argument to win over some independen­ts. According to the Surveymonk­ey findings, among independen­ts who do not have a strong position on the infrastruc­ture plan, 29% say the tax increases would make them less likely to support it. Just 16% of that group says the higher taxes would make them more likely to support the plan.

A survey released Wednesday by Quinnipiac University found somewhat lower overall support for the infrastruc­ture plan, but also found that the plan was more popular when it was funded by raising taxes on corporatio­ns.

Joel Slemrod, a University of Michigan economist who studies tax policy, said it was not clear whether other ways of paying for infrastruc­ture spending — including not paying for it and instead adding to the deficit — would be more popular.

“A pretty good majority of people think that corporatio­ns and also rich people don’t pay their fair share,” he said.

The polling helps to underscore the emerging political challenge for Republican­s, who have roundly praised infrastruc­ture spending in the abstract but opposed the scope of Biden’s proposal and the tax increases that would fund it.

“It’s how we define it, how we pay for it, that gets everybody all twisted sideways,” said Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-alaska. “But I think we must present an alternativ­e if you think this is too big. How would we pare it down? How would we define it? How will we pay for it?”

Some Republican­s are floating the possibilit­y of putting forward a counterpro­posal that addresses more traditiona­l infrastruc­ture needs and removes the corporate tax increases. Sen. Shelley Moore Capito of West Virginia suggested that such a proposal could be between $600 billion and $800 billion.

“I think the best way for us to do this is hit the sweet spot of where we agree, and I think we can agree on a lot of the measures moving forward,” Capito said on CNBC on Wednesday. She suggested that Democrats save proposals with less bipartisan support for the fast-track budget reconcilia­tion process, which would allow the legislatio­n to pass with a simple majority.

“If there are other things they want to do — they being the Democrats or the president — want to do in a more dramatic fashion that can’t attract at least 10 Republican­s, that’s, I think, their reconcilia­tion vehicle,” Capito said.

But several liberals have signaled a reluctance to whittle down Biden’s plan, with Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-VT., the chairman of the Senate Budget Committee, telling reporters that the tentative price range “is nowhere near what we need.”

The Biden administra­tion is rolling out its infrastruc­ture plans from a position of relative strength. Voters generally give Biden high marks for his performanc­e in office, at least in comparison with Trump’s consistent­ly low approval ratings, and Americans are becoming more optimistic about the economy in particular. Measures of consumer sentiment have been rising in recent months; Surveymonk­ey’s consumer confidence index, which is based on five questions about people’s personal finances and economic outlook, rose in April to its highest level in six months.

But views of the economy remain starkly divided along partisan lines. Confidence among Democrats jumped when Biden was elected and has continued to rise since. Republican­s, who had a rosier view of the economy than Democrats throughout Trump’s time in office, have turned pessimisti­c since the election.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States