Las Vegas Review-Journal

■ Prospects for an infrastruc­ture deal were thrown into doubt.

Infrastruc­ture proposal hits obstacle despite lower price tag

- By Lisa Mascaro and Jonathan Lemire

WASHINGTON — Prospects for an infrastruc­ture deal were thrown into serious doubt late Friday after the White House reduced President Joe Biden’s sweeping proposal to $1.7 trillion but Republican senators rejected the compromise as disappoint­ing, saying “vast difference­s” remain.

While talks have not collapsed, the downbeat assessment is certain to mean new worries from Democrats that time is slipping to strike a deal. The president’s team is holding to a soft Memorial Day deadline to determine whether a compromise is within reach.

Skepticism had been rising on all sides over the lack of significan­t movement off Biden’s $2.3 trillion plan or the GOP’S proposed $568 billion alternativ­e.

“This proposal exhibits a willingnes­s to come down in size,” said White House press secretary Jen Psaki, disclosing the new offer as talks were underway between key Cabinet secretarie­s and GOP senators.

But after the hourlong meeting, the Republican­s quickly rejected the new approach as “well above the range” of a proposal that could win bipartisan support.

The two sides “seem further apart” than when negotiatio­ns began, according to a statement from an aide to Sen. Shelley Moore Capito, R-W. Va., the lead negotiator for the group of six GOP senators.

The White House dispatched the transporta­tion and commerce secretarie­s and top aides to Capitol Hill to meet with the Republican­s this week, and they had a follow-up video call Friday.

According to a memo obtained by The Associated Press, the administra­tion’s new approach is cutting more than $550 billion from the president’s initial offer.

But the memo makes clear Biden is not interested in the Republican­s’ idea of having consumers pay for the new investment­s through tolls, gas taxes or other fees.

Instead, the administra­tion is sticking with his proposal to raise corporate taxes to pay for the new investment, which is a red line for Republican­s.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States