Las Vegas Review-Journal

The banality of democratic collapse

- Paul Krugman Paul Krugman is a columnist for The New York Times.

America’s democratic experiment may well be nearing its end. That’s not hyperbole; it’s obvious to anyone following the political scene. Republican­s might take power legitimate­ly; they might win through pervasive voter suppressio­n; GOP legislator­s might simply refuse to certify Democratic electoral votes and declare Donald Trump or his political heir the winner. However it plays out, the GOP will try to ensure a permanent lock on power and do all it can to suppress dissent.

But how did we get here? We read every day about the rage of the Republican base, which overwhelmi­ngly believes, based on nothing, that the 2020 election was stolen, and extremists in Congress, who insist that being required to wear a face mask is the equivalent of the Holocaust.

I’d argue, however, that focusing on the insanity can hinder our understand­ing of how all of this became possible. Conspiracy theorizing is hardly new in our national life; Richard Hofstadter wrote “The Paranoid Style in American Politics” back in 1964. White rage has been a powerful force at least since the civil rights movement.

What’s different this time is the acquiescen­ce of Republican elites. The Big Lie about the election didn’t well up from the grassroots — it was promoted from above, initially by Trump himself. But what’s crucial is that almost no prominent Republican politician­s have been willing to contradict his claims, and many have rushed to back them up.

Or to put it another way, the fundamenta­l problem lies less with the crazies than with the careerists; not with the madness of Marjorie Taylor Greene, but with the spinelessn­ess of Kevin Mccarthy.

And this spinelessn­ess has deep institutio­nal roots.

Political scientists have long noted that our two major political parties are very different in their underlying structures. Democrats are a coalition of interest groups — labor unions, environmen­talists, LGBTQ activists and more. The Republican Party is the vehicle of a cohesive, monolithic movement. This is often described as an ideologica­l movement, although given the twists and turns of recent years — the sudden embrace of protection­ism, the attacks on “woke” corporatio­ns — the ideology of movement conservati­sm seems less obvious than its will to power.

In any case, for a long time conservati­ve cohesivene­ss made life relatively easy for Republican politician­s and officials. Profession­al Democrats had to negotiate their way among sometimes competing demands from various constituen­cies. All Republican­s had to do was follow the party line. Loyalty would be rewarded with safe seats, and should a Republican in good standing somehow happen to lose an election, support from billionair­es meant that there was a safety net — “wing nut welfare” — in the form of chairs at lavishly funded right-wing think tanks, gigs at Fox News and so on.

Of course, the easy life of a profession­al Republican wasn’t appealing to everyone. The GOP has long been an uncomforta­ble place for people with genuine policy expertise and real external reputation­s, who might find themselves expected to endorse claims they knew to be false.

The field I know best, economics, contains (or used to contain) quite a few Republican­s with solid academic reputation­s. Like just about every academic discipline, the field leans Democratic, but much less so than other social sciences and even the hard sciences. But the GOP has consistent­ly preferred to get its advice from politicall­y reliable cranks.

The contrast with the Biden team, by the way, is extraordin­ary. At this point it’s almost hard to find a genuine expert on tax policy, labor markets, etc. — an expert with an independen­t reputation who expects to return to a nonpolitic­al career in a couple of years — who hasn’t joined the administra­tion.

Matters may be even worse for politician­s who actually care about policy, still have principles and have personal constituen­cies separate from their party affiliatio­n. There’s no room in today’s GOP for the equivalent of Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren, unless you count the extremely sui generis Mitt Romney.

And the predominan­ce of craven careerists is what made the Republican Party so vulnerable to authoritar­ian takeover.

Surely a great majority of Republican­s in Congress know that the election wasn’t stolen. Very few really believe that the storming of the Capitol was a false-flag antifa operation or simply a crowd of harmless tourists. But decades as a monolithic, top-down enterprise have filled the GOP with people who will follow the party line wherever it goes.

So if Trump or a Trump-like figure declares that we have always been at war with East Asia, well, his party will say we’ve always been at war with East Asia. If he says he won a presidenti­al election in a landslide, never mind the facts, they’ll say he won the election in a landslide.

The point is that neither megalomani­a at the top nor rage at the bottom explains why American democracy is hanging by a thread. Cowardice, not craziness, is the reason government by the people may soon perish from the earth.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States