Las Vegas Review-Journal

Big corporatio­ns resume donations to PACS

Some companies still adhere to moral stand

- By David Klepper

PROVIDENCE, R.I. — As shockwaves spread across the country from the Jan. 6 insurrecti­on at the U.S. Capitol, corporate America took a stand. Or so it seemed.

Dozens of big companies pledged to avoid donating money to the 147 lawmakers who objected to Congress’ certificat­ion of Joe Biden’s victory.

It was a striking gesture by some of the most familiar names in business but, as it turns out, it was largely an empty one.

Six months later, many of those companies have resumed funneling cash to political action committees that benefit the election efforts of lawmakers whether they objected to the election certificat­ion or not. When it comes to seeking political influence through corporate giving, business as usual is back, if it ever left.

Walmart, Pfizer, Intel, General Electric and AT&T are among companies that announced their pledges in the days after supporters of former President Donald Trump stormed the Capitol.

The companies contend that donating directly to a candidate is not the same as giving to a PAC that supports them.

The companies’ argument glosses over the fact that, in large measure, they did their giving through PACS before their pledge, rather than to individual­s, so in many cases, nothing changed.

“Pledging not to give to a certain person doesn’t mean that much when there are so many other ways that corporate money reaches elected officials,” said Daniel Weiner, a former senior counsel at the Federal Election Commission who now works at the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University’s law school. “These pledges are largely symbolic.”

Walmart’s moral stand lasted three months. In January, the retail giant said it would suspend all donations to the 147 lawmakers who objected to the election results. But in April, the company gave $30,000 to the National Republican Congressio­nal Committee, the party organizati­on that supports House Republican­s in elections.

Two-thirds of those House members voted against certifying Biden’s win.

Moreover, corporate donations to the party committees do not include so-called dark money contributi­ons given to groups that are not required to disclose details publicly.

Pfizer, GE, Walmart and other companies contacted by the AP said their criticism of lawmakers who objected to the election results stands.

For other companies, the pledges may just be a cynical attempt to look good in the eyes of the public. Few of the companies that made pledges tended to give big donations to individual lawmakers anyway.

Some companies did follow through on their pledges. Hallmark, for instance, said it would not donate to objectors — and the record to date shows no PAC donations by that company this year as well as no direct giving to the 147 objectors.

Hallmark also asked two objectors, Republican Sens. Josh Hawley of Missouri and Roger Marshall of Kansas, to return direct contributi­ons it made to them before the insurrecti­on. Campaign finance records do not yet show those refunds. Messages seeking comment from the two senators were not returned.

Other companies said they would halt campaign contributi­ons following Jan. 6 to give them time to reassess their campaign finance strategy. That list includes Charles Schwab, Citigroup, Archer Daniels Midland and Kraft Heinz.

Companies often give money to Democrats and Republican­s alike as they try to cultivate good relations with whichever party is in power.

 ?? Jose Luis Magana The Associated Press file ?? Supporters of President Donald Trump scale the west wall of the U.S. Capitol on
Jan. 6. Many companies who pledged not to give money to lawmakers who objected to certifying the election have resumed funneling cash to political action committees.
Jose Luis Magana The Associated Press file Supporters of President Donald Trump scale the west wall of the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6. Many companies who pledged not to give money to lawmakers who objected to certifying the election have resumed funneling cash to political action committees.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States