Las Vegas Review-Journal

Biden wants more handouts to wealthy EV buyers

- The views expressed above are those of the Las Vegas Review-journal. All other opinions expressed on the Opinion and Commentary pages are those of the individual artist or author indicated.

According to a recent survey by the Pew Research Center, 39 percent of Americans say they are “likely to consider” buying an electric car as their next vehicle. Will they follow through? More than a decade after the first Tesla Roadsters were delivered to customers, electric vehicles account for only about 3 percent of U.S. auto sales.

President Joe Biden hopes to goose that number to 50 percent by 2030 with a predictabl­e tactic: handouts to buyers.

Included in the massive and irresponsi­ble $3.5 trillion Democratic spending proposal is a provision to subsidize electric car sales by $12,500 per purchase. Electric vehicles are more expensive than traditiona­l cars and trucks, so administra­tion officials figure that direct subsidies for consumers and de facto subsidies for automakers will solve the problem.

According to a recent poll by CBS News, cost is the No. 1 reason why Americans won’t buy an electric vehicle, followed by concerns that there aren’t enough charging stations and that plug-ins don’t go far enough to meet their needs.

In response, Democrats and the administra­tion propose extending and expanding the current tax credit for such purchases — a great deal of which will end up in the accounts of wealthier Americans — while also subsidizin­g the creation of a nationwide government-run network of EV charging stations. Imagine if Washington owned all the country’s gasoline stations.

Per the bill in the House, the proposal excludes sedans costing more than $55,000, SUVS with a sticker price greater than $69,000 and trucks above $74,000 — although those limits apply only to a few vehicles. Meanwhile, couples making up to $800,000 — and individual­s up to $400,000 — would be eligible for the handout.

Fittingly, Democrats have used the giveaways as a means of lining the pockets of their benefactor­s in Big Labor. The credit would rise, the Wall Street Journal notes, for EVS produced at facilities “under a union-negotiated collective bargaining agreement.” It would also increase if a plug-in’s battery cells are made in the United States. As the Journal explains, the Democrats want to help their United Auto Workers friends organize Tesla and foreign-owned plants.

This is bad policy. We’ll put aside the rarely discussed reality that hitting a 50 percent market share for EVS will require the extraction of more minerals for battery production than Democrats and U.S. environmen­talists will ever tolerate. If EVS are the wave of the future, let them compete rather than providing handouts to automakers and consumers in order to manipulate the marketplac­e in the name of green edicts issued by Biden administra­tion central planners.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States