Las Vegas Review-Journal

Elites upset loan forgivenes­s helping ‘wrong’ people

- Yousef Baig Yousef Baig is an opinion editor for the Sacramento Bee

If there is an actual form of indoctrina­tion taking place in our schools, it has nothing to do with liberal ideals, gender identity or a more accurate portrayal of American history. It’s the idea that to be successful, you need to go to college. So, we have. After postsecond­ary schools desegregat­ed in 1965, the number of high school graduates enrolled in college has grown roughly 23%, according to U.S. Census Bureau figures. The number of Black students has nearly tripled over the past 30 years, and Latino students have experience­d the most dramatic enrollment increases since 2000, surging 14% over an 18-year span. Almost two in three Asian American children are going to college these days.

It’s no secret that higher education costs have skyrockete­d in my 32-year lifetime, a reality at the heart of President Joe Biden’s plan to forgive a portion of student loans for low-income and middle-class Americans. Between 1996 and 2016, the average amount of college debt per person rose more than $17,000, encompassi­ng 69% of students. By 2020, the U.S. concluded an egregious decade of debt accumulati­on, surpassing $1.7 trillion in student loans, 102% more than in 2010.

Biden’s decision to forgive up to $20,000 in student loans isn’t a handout for the rich, as right-wing zealots claim. It’s not going to increase inflation. It’s not going to force everyone else to bear the cost.

It’s going to level the playing field, and that’s what ideologues and people in power are most upset about.

Advances in college access and narrowing achievemen­t gaps over the last six decades have been overshadow­ed by gross increases in the price to simply participat­e in the higher education we were indoctrina­ted into regarding as essential. Over time, student debt helped perpetuate economic disparitie­s and curtail wealth accumulati­on for groups that were once underrepre­sented in colleges — specifical­ly women and nonwhite students.

Roughly 90% of debt cancellati­on will benefit people who make $75,000 or less, according to a U.S. Department of Education analysis. Those aren’t rich folks. In some California cities, that’s enough to qualify for subsidized housing.

However, the forgivenes­s will help an estimated 43 million people nationwide, 65% of whom are 39 or younger. That means the generation benefiting most will be millennial­s, who joined the economy at the height of the Great Recession, returned home to live with their parents in about a third of cases, and reached prime home-buying age when the pandemic struck.

Somehow, partisan hacks assert that a generation boasting a homeowners­hip rate 8% behind previous generation­s should be considered rich.

Do people really believe that?

Debt cancellati­on isn’t exclusive to college graduates, either. People who didn’t finish college average roughly $14,000 in student debts, and more than half don’t make payments, multiplyin­g the damage to middle- and working-class households.

At its essence, canceling student loans lifts the U.S. higher education barriers that slow the progress of women and nonwhite students — because no groups have seen greater educationa­l gains over the past 60 years, and no groups have been more disproport­ionately affected by college debt. We wanted a chance at the supposed “American meritocrac­y,” so we did what we were told to do.

The privileged class and wealthy partisans are trying their best to reduce loan forgivenes­s to a handout to the elite, but this is far from a culture war battle. It’s the realizatio­n that this country has to give younger and more diverse generation­s a real shot to catch up, and for some people, that’s terrifying.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States