Las Vegas Review-Journal

Calls had good reception

Umpires’ rulings were finally heard, and fans liked the sound of it

- By Ted Anthony

NEW YORK — After a century and a half of Major League Baseball — after generation­s of grunts and growls, of muffled shouts and dramatic arm gestures and a cultivated sense of remoteness — something quietly extraordin­ary happened to the national pastime this year: The umpires began talking to the world.

On April 5, umpire Ted Barrett spoke into a tiny microphone and said these 20 words: “After review, the call is confirmed. The batter was hit by the pitch. The Los Angeles Angels lose their challenge.” Suddenly, one of baseball’s most remote figures became a bit more human.

A policy change implemente­d at the beginning of the season, designed to explain on-field call challenges and outcomes, equipped umpires with tiny wireless microphone­s and — for the first time in baseball history — introduced their amplified voices to ballpark speakers, to the fans in their seats and to the world at home. They’ll be there on the sport’s biggest stage this month, too, during the playoffs and World Series.

Change in baseball is often measured in big things, loud things, significan­t things. Things like catchers being barred from blocking the plate. Like challenges adjudicate­d in a far-off room by out-of-sight officials.

Like next season’s plans for bases getting bigger, shifts getting restricted and the time between pitches — in a game that never had a clock — finally being counted.

But baseball is, if nothing else, a game of subtleties. And the notion of hearing a mic’d-up ump’s voice explaining something feels oddly revolution­ary, even after nearly an entire season of hearing it off and on.

“I think it is a good thing for the microphone to have replaced the megaphone, the booming oration, or mysterious hand signals,” says John Thorn, Major League Baseball’s official historian. “Instant replay, because it operates in (the) background, does require explanatio­n, especially when an on-field call is reversed.”

Hearing officials’ voices is hardly new; it has been standard in the NFL and other sports for years. But with their whistles, bright shirts and maskless faces, those sports’ officials never felt quite as remote. The umpire has always carried an air of mystery and sequestere­dness; for a sportswrit­er even to interview one can require special permission.

Yet it’s in keeping with the times. In most realms of entertainm­ent, more access — and thus more content — seems to be the trend. Athletes are mic’d up all over the place to bring fans closer to the action, including players and managers doing ingame TV interviews in the dugout or on the field while the game is in progress.

It’s more than that, though. There’s something about a voice that personaliz­es and humanizes. It’s why people feel like they know the morning DJS and podcast hosts who they listen to while waking up or driving to work.

So hearing the normal voices of the men whose verbal expression­s, in fans’ ears, have generally been restricted to grunts adds a dimension to watching a game — and adds informatio­n, too.

“In a small way, it can get people to understand that there’s actually a person in that uniform,” says retired MLB umpire Dale Scott, who knows something about the power of voice. In an earlier career, he was a disc jockey.

Being able to explain the game in real time, he says, is a sea change. He recalls the 2015 ALDS when Toronto Blue Jays catcher Russell Martin threw a ball back to the pitcher that hit Texas Rangers batter Shin-soo Choo. Scott was the homeplate umpire and says the ensuing disarray was complicate­d. He wishes he could have explained.

“There was mass confusion. A microphone then would have been very helpful,” says Scott, author of ” The Umpire Is Out: Calling the Game and Living My True Self.”

Greg Brown, the Pittsburgh Pirates’ longtime play-by-play announcer, watched with great interest through the season as more and more umpires got amplified. He approves. “To hear that voice is revealing. It seems like such a small thing, and then you peel it back,” Brown says.

“I always wondered: These other sports, why are they able to communicat­e with their fan base and we can’t? It was so frustratin­g,” Brown says. “It was a great relief to me that it finally got to the point where they were ready to embrace this opportunit­y.”

 ?? Nam Y. Huh The Associated Press ?? Umpire technology went to a new level this season, as on-field challenges were explained to fans at the park and at home for the first time, and the change was welcome.
Nam Y. Huh The Associated Press Umpire technology went to a new level this season, as on-field challenges were explained to fans at the park and at home for the first time, and the change was welcome.
 ?? Carlos Osorio The Associated Press ?? Umpire Marvin Hudson explains a replay review during a Twins-tigers game in July. A rule change allowed umpires to communicat­e rulings to fans at the park and at home for the first time this season.
Carlos Osorio The Associated Press Umpire Marvin Hudson explains a replay review during a Twins-tigers game in July. A rule change allowed umpires to communicat­e rulings to fans at the park and at home for the first time this season.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States