Las Vegas Review-Journal

For Biden, a chance for a fresh start in a new era of government

- By Peter Baker

WASHINGTON — President Joe Biden probably will not put it quite this way when he gets up before Congress to address the nation tonight, but the state of America’s union is disunion. To see that, he will need only turn around to find a Republican House speaker seated behind him, determined to block his every move.

So Biden’s message of unity, a hard sell already during his first two years in office, may prove even more out of sync as he delivers his first State of the Union address of this new era of divided government. Yet for a president who prides himself on working across the aisle, a unity pitch may paradoxica­lly be a useful cudgel to hammer his newly empowered opponents.

Biden plans to present himself to what is likely to be his largest television audience of the year as the adult in the room, willing and able to reach bipartisan compromise­s in an age of deep partisansh­ip, according to advisers, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe the speech in advance. He will point to legislatio­n he signed with Republican support since taking office and call on Speaker Kevin Mccarthy and the GOP majority that won control of the House in November’s midterm elections to follow that example.

But knowing that any such cooperatio­n is unlikely from a caucus that claims a mandate to resist him at every turn, Biden’s advisers expect him to try to draw a mature contrast to squabbling, angry Republican­s divided over the election of Mccarthy as speaker and more intent on investigat­ing Hunter Biden than advancing the nation’s business.

“Sometimes having divided government actually helps you politicall­y because it allows you, as president, to present your agenda as eminently reasonable, meaning that only unreasonab­le people would oppose what you’re trying to do,” said Peter H. Wehner, who was director of strategic initiative­s for President George W. Bush when Republican­s lost both chambers of Congress in the 2006 midterm elections.

“Biden’s been dealt a pretty good hand if you want to portray the opposition party as extreme and radical — because they are,” Wehner added. “Let’s call it a target-rich environmen­t.”

Still, White House advisers have been debating in recent days how hard to go after House

Republican­s after what they considered a decent meeting between Biden and Mccarthy, R-calif., on the debt limit and spending restraints. While the two leaders remained at loggerhead­s, both sides deemed the session an important step and advisers said the president cannot give up the idea of making deals, however unlikely they may seem.

The president huddled at Camp David over the weekend to go over the latest draft of the address with top advisers, including Mike Donilon, Bruce Reed, Anita Dunn and Steven J. Ricchetti, as well as Vinay Reddy, the chief White House speechwrit­er, and Jon Meacham, the historian, who often helps craft some of Biden’s most significan­t speeches.

Republican leaders have little incentive at the moment to seek common ground with Biden, pushed by their conservati­ve wing to stand up to what they characteri­ze as an administra­tion that has taken the country too far to the left with big-spending programs that have fueled inflation and deficits.

To respond to Biden’s address, GOP officials have selected Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders of Arkansas, the former White House press secretary under President Donald Trump, who made clear she planned to use her platform to highlight “the failures of President Biden,” as she put it in a statement.

“We are ready to begin a new chapter in the story of America — to be written by a new generation of leaders ready to defend our freedom against the radical left and expand access to quality education, jobs and opportunit­y for all,” she added.

Biden wants to use today’s speech to make the case that government works, citing legislatio­n to rebuild the nation’s roads, bridges and broadband, jumpstart the semiconduc­tor industry and expand health benefits for veterans, all of which passed on bipartisan votes. And he plans to discuss defending democracy at home and abroad at a time when Trump is talking about “terminatio­n” of part of the Constituti­on to restore himself to power and Russia is waging a war of conquest in Europe.

“The president’s message is made for this moment,” said Jon Favreau, who was President Barack Obama’s chief speechwrit­er when he lost the House in 2010. “He’s the guy who’s been working with both parties to get stuff done that matters to people, while Republican leaders have been working to appease the most extreme wing of their party. I would bet that he’ll emphasize policies that have broad, bipartisan appeal and ask for good faith cooperatio­n instead of cheap political stunts. And if Republican­s refuse, he can take that case to the American people in 2024.”

By all accounts, Biden plans to announce a campaign for reelection, probably in March or April. Advisers are acutely aware that his delivery of the speech may be as important as its content, that he needs to appear forceful and vigorous at age 80 to demonstrat­e that he can handle the burdens of the presidency even at 86, at the end of eight years in the Oval Office.

To that end, former speechwrit­ers for other presidents said White House aides may be especially attuned to ensuring that sentences are not too long and do not include words he may stumble over. In last year’s State of the Union address, Biden said “Iranian” when he meant “Ukrainian,” “America” when he meant “Delaware” and “profits” when he meant “prices.” But he exhibited energy, which will be important to display tonight.

Biden is not the first president to face the challenge of taking on ascendant congressio­nal opposition after a midterm defeat. All four of the most recent presidents lost at least one house of Congress during their tenures, forcing them to recalibrat­e, each in his own way and with varying degrees of success.

After a Republican sweep in 1994, President Bill Clinton pivoted toward the middle, confrontin­g Speaker Newt Gingrich before eventually forging compromise­s to overhaul welfare and balance the budget. Bush defied the new Democratic Congress elected in 2006 by sending more troops to Iraq, but teamed with Speaker Nancy Pelosi to tackle the financial crisis of 2008. Obama gave up his most expansive legislativ­e ambitions after the House went Republican in 2010, turning instead to executive actions to pursue his goals.

Trump relished waging war against Pelosi’s Democrats after they seized the House in 2018 and made no effort to move to the political middle, although he did agree to bipartisan relief packages once the COVID-19 pandemic hit. Trump ended up being impeached by House Democrats — twice — although he was never convicted by the Senate.

The difference for Biden is that while Democrats lost the House in November, it was not perceived as a repudiatio­n the way it was for his four most recent predecesso­rs because the election did not produce the Republican “red wave” many had anticipate­d. Although Republican­s took the House, they did so with the barest of majorities.

“The change then was in many respects far more dramatic,” said Don Baer, who was Clinton’s chief speechwrit­er, recalling the 1994 Republican victories. And the politics of opposition have changed since then. Gingrich and his Republican­s felt compelled to try to enact a policy agenda, called the Contract With America, not solely to be obstructio­nist.

“For President Clinton, it was a matter of finding the right way to navigate a constructi­ve way to work together,” Baer said, “while in this case, there doesn’t seem to be any willingnes­s whatsoever to work together.”

Polarizati­on has become the new normal in American society. Three-quarters of Americans consider the country divided and they are, naturally, divided about whom to blame, according to a poll by Yougov. Only 23% say Biden has made the nation more united, while 44% say he has made it more divided and 24% say he has made little difference.

Biden finished his second year in office with more political good news than after his rocky first year. Gas prices and inflation are falling, unemployme­nt is at its lowest level in more than half a century and average daily COVID-19 deaths are down about 75% since his last State of the Union speech. He passed major legislatio­n tackling prescripti­on drug prices and climate change while assembling strong coalitions at home and abroad to confront Russia’s aggression against Ukraine.

Yet the border crisis has inflamed many Republican voters and a new investigat­ion into the mishandlin­g of classified documents has sapped some of his momentum. More profoundly, Americans remain unmoved in their views of Biden. His approval rating stands at 42%, barely above the 41% at his last State of the Union address, according to an aggregatio­n of surveys by Fivethirty­eight — and lower at this stage than any president in 75 years of polling except for Trump and Ronald Reagan, who was hobbled by a deep recession.

Trump of course went on to lose reelection, but Biden prefers the lessons of Reagan, Clinton and Obama, all of whom rebounded to win a second term. Each of them started out their path to recovery with a State of the Union address.

 ?? SARAHBETH MANEY / THE NEW YORK TIMES ?? President Joe Biden arrives March 1, 2022, to deliver his State of the Union address to a joint session of Congress at the Capitol. Behind him, Vice President Kamala Harris and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-calif., look on. The president plans to use his first State of the Union address since Republican­s took control of the House to call for bipartisan cooperatio­n; neither he nor many others fully expect that to happen.
SARAHBETH MANEY / THE NEW YORK TIMES President Joe Biden arrives March 1, 2022, to deliver his State of the Union address to a joint session of Congress at the Capitol. Behind him, Vice President Kamala Harris and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-calif., look on. The president plans to use his first State of the Union address since Republican­s took control of the House to call for bipartisan cooperatio­n; neither he nor many others fully expect that to happen.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States