Las Vegas Review-Journal

Putin began his unjust war one year ago; here’s what Ukraine needs now


Ayear since Vladimir Putin ordered his forces to invade Ukraine, the war is far from over. However bravely Ukrainians fight on, and however muddled the performanc­e of Russia’s military, Ukraine cannot prevail without continued and substantia­l Western assistance. Since the invasion, that has swelled to more than $150 billion in U.S. and European spending, and the weapons supplied to Ukraine now include the latest Western tanks and anti-aircraft systems.

The United States and its major allies have been steadfast in their resolve to support Ukraine in its fight, and their people have largely accepted the enormous cost. In the United States, the political resistance has been limited largely to a few voices on the far right and far left. But questions will become only more common as the war drags on. As House Speaker Kevin Mccarthy, R-calif., who is a strong supporter of Ukraine, has warned, “There should be no blank check on anything.”

He’s right.

Outside Europe and the United States, support for the Ukrainian cause is much less solid, making efforts to punish Russia for its aggression less effective. To strengthen that support as the second year of this terrible and unnecessar­y conflict begins, it is useful to examine why it is in the interest of the United States and other democracie­s to expend so much wealth and to take so great a risk in confrontin­g a nuclear power.

The first reason, and the one that prompted an immediate response from the West, is the moral and ethical obligation of the world’s democracie­s to help a nation whose freedom is threatened by an authoritar­ian power. National self-determinat­ion has long been a guiding principle of U.S. foreign policy. Various U.S. administra­tions have honored it imperfectl­y, as is the case with so many guiding principles. But it remains valuable in finding a way forward. In sending an armored column toward Kyiv, Ukraine, and seeking to overthrow its government, Putin clearly violated that principle and threatens to return Europe to the instabilit­y of previous eras, when nations frequently invaded one another and altered the continent’s borders by force.

Russians might argue that the United States is hardly the innocent in its global dealings, whether invading Iraq on false pretenses or covertly working to overthrow government­s in, among others, Chile and Nicaragua. Certainly, there is much to criticize and debate in America’s foreign policy during and since the Cold War. There are also those who argue that the United States provoked Putin by pushing to bring Ukraine (and Georgia) into NATO.

The wisdom of incorporat­ing former Soviet bloc countries into NATO remains a topic of considerab­le disagreeme­nt among historians, but it is important to remember that it was not NATO that rushed to expand. Rather, many countries that had suffered Moscow’s repressive and often brutal control urgently sought the protection­s of the Western alliance against what they anticipate­d and feared would be a resurgence of Russian ambitions. As for Ukraine, the prospect of joining NATO anytime soon had dissipated long before the Russian invasion.

The danger Putin saw was not to Russia’s sphere of influence but to his personal sphere of power; a democratic, pro-western Ukraine threatened to spread ideas that would directly challenge his monopoly on power. It is no coincidenc­e that Putin’s growing aggressive­ness toward the West developed in tandem with his growing authoritar­ianism at home. As his regime grew ever more repressive, his need for foreign threats, real or concocted, increased proportion­ately, to justify tightening the screws on domestic opposition.

In the end, nothing the United States or its allies have done or have failed to do in the three decades since the collapse of the Soviet Union even remotely justifies Putin’s attempt to bend Ukraine to his will by brute force. He has to be stopped, and Ukraine has to be allowed to choose a democratic, independen­t future. That is what U.S. leaders should stress in justifying continued support.

A conflict that ends with a stronger Ukraine will send a message that the United States does have the resolve and capability to help counter the excesses of autocrats and bullies. The Biden administra­tion’s regular declaratio­ns of full support for Ukraine, even when military aspects of that support are under discussion, demonstrat­e that America has not, as Putin thought, forever lost its ability to lead. America’s readiness to stand up to Putin has united most of the world’s major democracie­s behind a common cause.

It is hard to imagine, for example, that, without a strong commitment from Washington, Sweden or Finland would have applied to join a NATO that only three years ago French President Emmanuel Macron described as “brain-dead,” or that Germany would have agreed to send tanks to repel Russia. And while key allies such as Britain, France, Germany, Poland and others may not match America’s level of support, they have shown a readiness to absorb far greater economic consequenc­es stemming from sanctions on Russia.

Still, with so much uncertaint­y about the outcome on the battlefiel­d, it remains unclear even what “victory” might mean for either side. A return to the dividing lines of a year ago would perpetuate tensions along more than 1,000 miles, and it is unlikely that Russians would ever renounce their claim to Crimea, the Black Sea peninsula they’ve occupied since 2014 and regard as incontesta­bly Russian land.

Only diplomacy can achieve anything resembling a viable peace settlement. Ultimately, that should be the goal of all support for Ukraine. It is the only way Russians can start to reverse their economic and social alienation from Europe and the only way Europeans can reaffirm the postwar order that brought them decades of relative stability, prosperity and security.

But serious diplomacy has a chance only if Russia accepts that it cannot bring Ukraine to its knees. And for that to happen, the United States and its allies cannot waver in their support.

A conflict that ends with a stronger Ukraine will send a message that the United States does have the resolve and capability to help counter the excesses of autocrats and bullies.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States