Las Vegas Review-Journal

Government stands in way of air traffic reform

- JOHN STOSSEL COMMENTARY Every Tuesday at Johnstosse­l.com, Stossel posts a new video about the battle between government and freedom.

YOUR flight is delayed? Blame your government. OK, it’s not always the government’s fault. Sometimes it’s weather or mechanical problems. But often we suffer horrible flight delays because politician­s won’t relinquish power.

In January, flights were grounded when the government’s “Notice to Air Missions” system broke down. That was just the latest incident.

America rightly prides itself on being on the cutting edge of innovation. But it’s the private sector that innovates. Government rarely does. Asked if America’s air traffic control system is out of date, Transporta­tion Secretary Pete Buttigieg paused a long time before answering, “The system is continuous­ly being upgraded.”

But the government has been “upgrading” air traffic control for decades, promising to switch to a “Nextgen” system that uses satellite navigation. But implementa­tion keeps being postponed.

Air traffic control is still a lot like it was in the 1960s. Controller­s use paper strips to track flights. Instead of using computers, they move paper around manually. “This is your government at work,” Diana Furchtgott-roth said in my latest video. Furchtgott-roth worked for the Transporta­tion Department during the Trump administra­tion.

I yell at her. “Air traffic control was in your department. You could have fixed it. You should have fixed it!” She smiles and explains that although she had control of $1 billion, she wasn’t allowed to move those funds to where they were needed.

Government managers must fund projects pushed by politician­s, such as “Justice40,” meant to fix “underinves­tment in disadvanta­ged communitie­s.”

Computer hardware isn’t left behind in Canada. They got rid of “flight control with paper strips” years ago. That’s because Canada turned air traffic control over to a private company. They switched to an electronic system.

Dozens of countries have privatized or partially privatized. Computer screens have replaced not-always-clear windows in many air traffic control centers. Controller­s don’t use binoculars anymore because high-definition cameras let them see much more.

A Government Accountabi­lity Office study found that in countries that privatized, there are fewer delays and costs are lower. So why doesn’t America privatize?

Because our politician­s get money from labor unions, who “advocate for keeping the same people in the same jobs,” Furchtgott-roth said.

Another opponent is the private plane lobby. Under our system, Congress makes sure that the big airlines, which you fly, subsidize private flights’ air traffic fees.

A third obstacle is fear. “For-profit companies will cut corners and make flying less safe!” But this is nonsense. That GAO study found that safety stayed the same or improved in countries that privatized. Also, “For-profit companies actually run the airlines!” Furchtgott-roth pointed out.

The airlines get FAA supervisio­n, but the main reason planes don’t crash is because the companies don’t want to destroy their business by killing their customers. There hasn’t been a commercial airline crash in 14 years. By contrast, government-run airlines do crash. Aeroflot (the Soviet airline) killed thousands.

In America, privatizat­ion would reduce delays and make flying even safer. But our arrogant politician­s won’t allow it. They insist government run things. But because government­s rarely innovate, you must sit at the airport and wait.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States