Las Vegas Review-Journal

Impeachmen­t inquiry cheapens process

-

The move by House Republican­s last week to formally open an impeachmen­t inquiry against President Joe Biden was perhaps predictabl­e back in January 2021 — with then-president Donald Trump’s second impeachmen­t, for his role in the Jan. 6 assault on the Capitol — or even as far back as December 2019, with Trump’s first impeachmen­t, for trying to strong-arm Ukraine’s government into helping him win reelection.

But that predictabi­lity doesn’t make the GOP’S Biden impeachmen­t inquiry any less of a cynical, pathetic stunt. House Republican­s have been thrashing around for a year trying to find something, anything on Biden that is remotely impeachabl­e. There’s nothing.

Yet they’re formally moving ahead anyway, barely bothering to disguise that they are merely seeking payback for the two fully justified impeachmen­ts against Trump by launching a patently unjustifie­d one against Biden.

It is probably inevitable now that every president in the foreseeabl­e future who faces a House held by the opposing party will just automatica­lly come under an impeachmen­t inquiry, justified or not.

The crux of Republican­s’ allegation­s against Biden, such as they are, center on the various business schemes of his son Hunter Biden. The younger Biden is in fact a shady underachie­ver who has tried to leverage his last name for profit and who perhaps belongs in prison. He may be headed there; he is under indictment on federal tax and firearms charges.

The problem for House Republican­s is that their attempts to prove President Biden was corruptly involved in his son’s dealing have produced nothing.

No, Biden’s pressure on Ukraine to fire a crooked prosecutor while he was vice president wasn’t an attempt to protect his son from prosecutio­n for his business dealings there. Biden was doing the bidding of the Obama administra­tion and internatio­nal organizati­ons that wanted the prosecutor out because he wasn’t doing his job.

No, there’s no evidence that Biden thumbed the scales at the Justice Department to protect his son from prosecutio­n. Again, the younger Biden is currently facing felony charges.

No, the $4,000 Hunter Biden paid to his father in 2018 wasn’t evidence that Joe Biden (then a private citizen) was involved in his son’s schemes; it was reimbursem­ent for a car purchase that the younger Biden couldn’t make himself because of his bad credit.

Even the Republican­s spearheadi­ng the impeachmen­t inquiry say the reason for making the inquiry formal isn’t because they suddenly have evidence of impeachabl­e conduct, but because it will make it easier to look for such evidence.

Remember during the 2010 debate over the Affordable Care Act, when then-house Speaker Nancy Pelosi caused Republican heads everywhere to explode by declaring, “We have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it”? It’s like that — except, instead of mere legislatio­n, that twisted logic is being applied to the somber and potentiall­y dangerous process of removing a sitting president.

Trump was impeached for endangerin­g national security by trying to extort a global ally for political purposes, and then for his unpreceden­ted betrayal of his office in attempting to overturn a valid election.

Biden, in glaring contrast, is facing this impeachmen­t inquiry for no reason but that House Republican­s have made a conscious decision to politicize and cheapen an urgent constituti­onal function to the point of making it meaningles­s.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States