Las Vegas Review-Journal

Kudos to Haley for calling out Trump’s tariff plans

- Catherine Rampell Catherine Rampell is a columnist for The Washington Post.

Kudos to GOP presidenti­al candidate Nikki Haley for saying what virtually no one else in either party is willing to admit these days: Tariffs are taxes that raise costs for Americans. Haley, who was U.N. ambassador under President Donald Trump, has finally stepped up criticism of her former boss and 2024 rival. She has attacked Trump’s cozy relationsh­ip with authoritar­ians, his mental fitness and his spending record.

But perhaps her most striking line of attack was this: “This is a man who now wants to go and put 10% tariffs across the board, raising taxes on every single American,” Haley said Monday on CNBC. “It’s going to raise the cost of anything from baby strollers to appliances under Donald Trump. Middle-class families can’t afford that.”

Haley was referring to Trump’s promise to jack up taxes by 10% on all imports into the United States, regardless of whether they’re from friends or foes. Trump also reportedly plans to levy a 60% tariff on all Chinese goods.

Trump and his allies have claimed that these tariffs would be paid by foreigners and bring back U.S. manufactur­ing jobs. Evidence suggests otherwise.

When Trump was president, he levied tariffs on everything from steel to washing machines to hundreds of billions of dollars’ worth of products from China. These trade wars were studied exhaustive­ly by serious economists at Harvard, Princeton, the Federal Reserve, the Internatio­nal Monetary Fund, the University of Chicago, etc. Four separate studies determined that the costs of these tariffs were borne mostly or entirely by Americans in the form of higher prices.

There’s also ample evidence that Trump’s trade wars hurt U.S. jobs. That’s because many of the things he tariffed were inputs that American manufactur­ers buy to produce their own goods.

For example, Trump imposed tariffs on foreign-made steel and aluminum. But there are many more workers employed by U.S. firms that purchase these materials (automakers, appliance manufactur­ers) than those that produce it. The result was an estimated 75,000 fewer jobs in manufactur­ing attributab­le to metal tariffs alone.

The numbers look worse if you consider other countries’ retaliator­y tariffs.

U.s.-produced soybeans, bourbon, motorcycle­s and other important exports were all hit with such foreign taxes, which hurt U.S. competitiv­eness abroad. A separate working paper released recently found that those retaliator­y tariffs cost jobs, particular­ly in U.S. farming.

In a second term, Trump’s plans to escalate these economic standoffs would likely cause much more pain. Exactly how much Trump’s additional tariffs would hurt the economy is hard to know because it depends on how harshly other countries retaliate. Early comments from European leaders, though, suggest blowback could be fierce.

Capital Economics, a private economic analysis firm, estimated that Trump’s policies would subtract up to 1.5% from U.S. gross domestic product and “trigger a rebound in inflation that could force the Fed to raise interest rates again.” Adam Posen, president of the Peterson Institute for Internatio­nal Economics, ballparks that the 10% global tariff alone would roughly double today’s pace of inflation.

If inflation is your top election issue — or your party’s — this seems worth paying attention to.

Yet somehow, most Republican politician­s (except Haley) have been curiously mum.

“Regarding tariffs, Gov. Haley is doing what politician­s, including Republican­s, do not do clearly enough or often enough — especially when President Trump is proposing the tariffs: state that they are a tax on consumers,” says Michael Strain, the American Enterprise Institute’s director of economic policy studies.

Trump’s daft trade agenda could be a slam-dunk issue for Democrats. They’ve bungled it.

Democrats (accurately) blasted Trump’s trade wars when he was in office. In 2019, for example, then-candidate Joe Biden said, “President Trump may think he’s being tough on China. All that he’s delivered as a consequenc­e of that is American farmers, manufactur­ers and consumers losing and paying more.”

But as president, Biden has mostly kept his predecesso­r’s tariffs in place or swapped them out for different trade restrictio­ns.

It’s a lonely world out there for those who value the economic, not to mention diplomatic, benefits of trade. It would be less lonely if more public officials followed Haley’s example and explained to voters who and what is stressing their pocketbook­s.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States