Las Vegas Review-Journal

Creative destructio­n: AI and American jobs

- Will Every Tuesday at Johnstosse­l.com, Stossel posts a new video about the battle between government and freedom.

THE media warn, “Artificial intelligen­ce will replace millions of jobs.” In San Francisco, Teamsters protest, demanding the government “protect” their jobs. In my new video, they chant, “Do not have these self-driving vehicles on San Francisco streets, taking jobs!” They’re complainin­g about the Waymo driverless taxis already in use in part of San Francisco (and Phoenix).

The union is right to worry. Robot cars don’t get tired. They don’t take lunch breaks. They don’t drink or get distracted. Self-driving cars will replace many delivery driver jobs, taxi jobs, Uber jobs and truck driver jobs.

Texas is building a special highway with a lane just for self-driving trucks.

The idea isn’t just to save money by having machines do what people do now but to get human drivers off the road entirely.

Safety advocates want that, because despite publicity over occasional robot-car crashes, we humans make many more mistakes. Robo-cars will save thousands of lives.

But when I said that in a column last month, some of you said government officials will soon use “safety” as an excuse to outlaw human driving.

“Regulators will try to ban traditiona­l cars,” orangecrat­e26 writes. “You’re not taking my Mustang, or my guns.”

Government will have “total control of your movement,” another writes. “No movement at all if you think the wrong way.”

It’s a threat I hadn’t considered. Because lots of you like driving, and politician­s fear upsetting big voting groups, I assumed government wouldn’t ban human driving altogether. But I’ve been wrong about state intrusions before.

What I haven’t been wrong about is the job loss. Some people lose jobs because of AI. But history suggests that most will find better jobs.

More than 90 percent of America’s workers once worked on farms. Better farm equipment replaced most of those jobs. Today, only about 1 percent of Americans work on farms. Are the former farmers out of work? No, most found other jobs, better jobs — jobs less demanding and dangerous than farming.

There were once half a million typists in America. Nearly all of those jobs are gone. So are thousands of phone and elevator operator jobs. Bank tellers were replaced by ATM machines and online banking. Video rental stores were killed by streaming services.

But after those people lost jobs, there was no surge in unemployme­nt. In fact, over the past 15 years, unemployme­nt has dropped. Wages, adjusted for inflation, are up. No union predicted that.

It happened because, as machines took jobs that humans once did, people searched for different, better work. Most found it. This creative destructio­n makes almost everyone better off. Although you won’t convince the unions.

AI will create lots of disruptive job change, probably more drastic than anything in the past. But history suggests that this change is probably good news.

My brain is too small to know what those jobs will be. But they will come. Of course, it’s possible that AI robots decide that we humans are in their way and just kill us. That does worry some AI researcher­s. Then all bets are off.

But short of that, the AI job change will mostly be a good thing.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States