Las Vegas Review-Journal

Who will want to work for the president now?

- Patricia Lopez Patricia Lopez is a columnist for Bloomberg Opinion.

In a fit of pique, stung by their inability to take action on the border crisis, House Republican­s have resorted to their usual go-to moves: distractio­n and retributio­n. It is a playbook that has been used before in state government, with a far less satisfying result: frustratio­n.

This month’s impeachmen­t of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas by a single vote was certainly disgracefu­l, as Republican­s presented no credible evidence of any wrongdoing. They simply don’t like the policies of President Joe Biden and needed to change the subject from their own policy failures — including a previous failed attempt to impeach Mayorkas. The bar should be much higher. As Biden rightly noted shortly after the vote Feb. 13: “History will not look kindly on House Republican­s for their blatant act of unconstitu­tional partisansh­ip.”

But the impeachmen­t was more than just petty — it was also dangerous and corrosive. When Republican­s in Minnesota and Wisconsin took out their frustratio­ns with Democratic governors in recent years, it threatened the states’ ability to attract top candidates to appointed positions. Who is going to take a job if they could be fired simply for following the chief executive’s agenda?

In Minnesota, where only 17 commission­ers had been rejected in the previous 85 years, two major commission­ers were removed within a month in 2020. Senate Republican­s were using the votes to force Gov. Tim Walz’s hand on other issues. Unlike with Mayorkas, a vote against the commission­er in question meant she had to vacate the office immediatel­y. The following year, a third commission­er resigned rather than face the prospect of being forced out. Others were threatened, including a well-respected health commission­er during the pandemic.

The result? Disruption and delays in attending to far more important tasks that had a tangible impact on Minnesotan­s, such as the issuance of pandemic rebate checks.

So commonplac­e did the practice become that in August 2020, the Republican leader of the House tweeted: “Looks like the Senate is executing a prisoner today.” Eventually some Republican­s began to have misgivings about the tactic, which created disruption but ultimately little change. The practice was ended once Democrats regained narrow control of the Senate in 2023 and changed the rules.

Then there is the case of Wisconsin, where the Republican Senate voted to oust eight appointees of Democratic Gov. Tony Evers on a single day in October 2023. (In the preceding 40 years only five had been rejected.) As Evers noted at the time: “This is insanity, and this is an issue of democracy — Republican­s have to stop doing this. These Wisconsini­tes are completely qualified to do the job they’ve been asked to do, and they are volunteeri­ng their time, talent and expertise without pay to serve their neighbors and our state.”

The weaponizat­ion of the impeachmen­t process also undermines its power to force accountabi­lity and preserve the system of checks and balances. It will become just another political tool. Consider what Rep. Mark Green, R-tenn. and chair of the Homeland Security committee, said when asked whether he was concerned about who might replace Mayorkas: “Of course I am, but if that person doesn’t do his job well, we will impeach his ass too.”

Of course, the impeachmen­t vote will not remove Mayorkas. That would require the vote of two-thirds of a Senate narrowly controlled by Democrats.

If Mayorkas is smart, he will use his trial to show what the administra­tion has done to improve security on the border, and to highlight the abject failure of Republican­s to allocate the funding they know is needed. The opportunit­y is rare: a high-profile forum to publicize the Republican Party’s repeated failures to address a crisis at a time when that crisis is a top concern for Republican voters.

Democrats need to be as unafraid on the issue of immigratio­n as they are on abortion. Strong and consistent border enforcemen­t; firm but humane treatment of those who cross over; swift and fair handling of court cases; and sustained and focused attention to the causes of illegal migration — all are necessary to resolve the border crisis. Not one of those issues was advanced, much less addressed, by the Republican­s’ cowardly decision to impeach Mayorkas.

 ?? ALEX BRANDON / ASSOCIATED PRESS FILE (2023) ?? Mayorkas testifies
Nov. 8 during a hearing of the Senate Appropriat­ions Committee on Capitol Hill. Mayorkas became the first Cabinet official impeached in nearly
150 years when House Republican­s voted on party lines to do so.
ALEX BRANDON / ASSOCIATED PRESS FILE (2023) Mayorkas testifies Nov. 8 during a hearing of the Senate Appropriat­ions Committee on Capitol Hill. Mayorkas became the first Cabinet official impeached in nearly 150 years when House Republican­s voted on party lines to do so.
 ?? J. SCOTT APPLEWHITE / ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? House Homeland Security Chair Mark Green, R-tenn., talks about the House impeachmen­t of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, during a news conference Feb. 14 at the Capitol.
J. SCOTT APPLEWHITE / ASSOCIATED PRESS House Homeland Security Chair Mark Green, R-tenn., talks about the House impeachmen­t of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, during a news conference Feb. 14 at the Capitol.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States