Birth control win is just one step forward in fight for true bodily autonomy

In recent years, there has been a monumental shift in access to reproductive health care, marked by the availability of the first over-the-counter birth control at pharmacies, convenience stores and grocery stores — Opill. This significant milestone has empowered individuals to take control of their reproductive health like never before. However, as we celebrate this progress, it’s crucial to recognize that there’s still much work to be done, particularly concerning the accessibility of abortion pills.

The approval of over-the-counter birth control is a landmark victory for reproductive rights advocates. It signifies a departure from antiquated regulations and underscores the importance of ensuring equitable access to contraception. By eliminating the need for a prescription, individuals are granted greater autonomy over their reproductive choices, which is a fundamental aspect of bodily autonomy and gender equity.

Yet, while over-the-counter birth control represents a significant step forward, it also serves as a stark reminder of the glaring disparities in reproductive health care access. Despite its efficacy and safety, the abortion pill remains inaccessible to many people due to restrictive regulations and bans. Mifepristone, one of the two medications used in medication abortion, has been proven to be safer than commonly available drugs such as Tylenol, penicillin and Viagra. However, its distribution is heavily regulated, placing unnecessary barriers in the path of those seeking abortion care with a medication that has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration and known to be safe and effective for more than 20 years. In the meantime, Walgreens and CVS have begun steps to stock and prescribe mifepristone at many locations in states where abortion is legal.

Today, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in a critical case regarding the accessibility of the abortion pill. The question at hand is whether mifepristone can continue to be prescribed and mailed in the same manner as other medications. This decision holds immense implications for reproductive rights, particularly for marginalized communities that already face significant challenges in accessing health care services.

If the court decides in favor of allowing continued access to abortion pills by mail, it would represent a monumental victory for reproductive justice. It would signify a recognition of the importance of protecting equitable access to abortion care, regardless of one’s geographic location or socioeconomic status. However, failure to do so would exacerbate existing disparities, disproportionately affecting marginalized communities.

In this critical moment, organizations like the Women’s Reproductive Rights Assistance Program play a crucial role in bridging the gap in access to abortion care. Since April 2022, it has been funding access to the abortion pill by mail, providing crucial support to those in need.

Over-the-counter birth control is undoubtedly a significant achievement, but it cannot be the end goal. True bodily autonomy can only be achieved when people have unimpeded access to the full spectrum of reproductive health care, including abortion care.

The Supreme Court should recognize the importance of protecting access to the abortion pill and ensuring equitable access to abortion care for all.