Lexington Herald-Leader (Sunday)

Israeli officials weigh role for Arab states in postwar Gaza

- BY PATRICK KINGSLEY

For months, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel has avoided detailed public discussion about the Gaza Strip’s postwar future. Trying to placate both his far-right allies, who seek to rebuild Israeli settlement­s in Gaza, and Israel’s foreign partners, who want Gaza returned to Palestinia­n governance, Netanyahu has stopped short of any specific declaratio­n.

Behind the scenes, however, senior officials in his office have been weighing an expansive plan for postwar Gaza, in which Israel would offer to share oversight of the territory with an alliance of Arab countries, including Egypt, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, as well as the United States, according to three Israeli officials and five people who have discussed the plan with members of the Israeli government.

According to that proposal, Israel would do so in exchange for normalized relations between itself and Saudi Arabia, according to the people, who spoke on the condition of anonymity given the sensitivit­y of the matter.

Far-right members of Netanyahu’s coalition are almost certain to dismiss such an idea, and so are the Arab countries mentioned as possible participan­ts. But it is the clearest sign yet that officials at the highest levels of Israel’s government are thinking about Gaza’s postwar future, despite saying little in public, and could be a starting point in future negotiatio­ns.

The disclosure comes against the backdrop of intense internatio­nal efforts to get Israel and Hamas to agree to a cease-fire that could eventually become a permanent truce, and it follows growing pressure on Israel to plan for what comes next. Israel’s reluctance to determine how to govern Gaza has created a power vacuum in much of the territory, leading to lawlessnes­s and worsening the dire humanitari­an situation.

Arab officials and analysts have called the power-sharing plan unworkable because it does not create an explicit path toward a Palestinia­n state, which the Emirati and Saudi government­s have said is a prerequisi­te for their involvemen­t in postwar planning. But others have cautiously welcomed the proposal because it at least suggests greater flexibilit­y among Israeli leaders than their public statements suggest.

Under the proposal, the Arab-Israeli alliance, working with the United States, would appoint leaders in Gaza to redevelop the devastated territory, overhaul its education system and maintain order. After between seven and 10 years, the alliance would allow Palestinia­ns to vote on whether to be absorbed into a united Palestinia­n administra­tion that would govern in both Gaza and the Israeli-occupied West Bank, according to the proposal. In the meantime, the plan suggests, the Israeli military could continue to operate inside Gaza.

The proposal does not explicitly say whether that united administra­tion would constitute a sovereign Palestinia­n state, or if it would include the Palestinia­n Authority, which administer­s parts of the West Bank. Publicly, Netanyahu has rejected the idea of full Palestinia­n sovereignt­y and all but ruled out the involvemen­t of the Palestinia­n Authority.

The Israeli prime minister’s office declined to comment.

 ?? AVISHAG SHAAR-YASHUV NYT ?? Israeli soldiers in March 31 operate in Gaza. Though likely to displease both Israel’s right wing and many Arab states, a postwar plan to share oversight of Gaza signals that Israel is thinking about the region’s future.
AVISHAG SHAAR-YASHUV NYT Israeli soldiers in March 31 operate in Gaza. Though likely to displease both Israel’s right wing and many Arab states, a postwar plan to share oversight of Gaza signals that Israel is thinking about the region’s future.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States