Lodi News-Sentinel

Compton gun heist remains a mystery

- By Angel Jennings, Joe Mozingo, Javier Panzar and Richard Winton

COMPTON — The guns were kept in a 1920s-era vault in a municipal building on North Alameda Street.

Compton officials struggled for months to say where they came from, and now where a load of them have gone.

The city dismantled its police force 18 years ago. Were they left over from the old department? Were they sidearms removed four years ago from code enforcemen­t officers who had taken to arming themselves? Were they purchased as part of a failed push to revive the police force in 2010?

Those were the questions last year when a new city manager, Cecil Rhambo Jr., learned about the stash in the old City Hall building from a code enforcemen­t officer. He ordered them to be inventorie­d and turned over to the Los Angeles County Sheriff ’s Department.

Deputies counted 198 weapons in March. When they went back to retrieve the guns in August, there were 167.

Now Rhambo, the Sheriff ’s Department and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives are asking: Who stole 31 of them?

Whoever it was made off with 23 Beretta .40-caliber pistols and eight Glock .40-caliber pistols.

Sheriff’s Department and Compton city officials notified the ATF, which opened an investigat­ion in September and is offering a $10,000 reward for informatio­n leading to an arrest and conviction.

“None of them have shown up at crime scenes,” said Ginger Colbrun, an ATF spokeswoma­n in L.A. “That’s in part why we decided to put out the reward.”

Colbrun said agents have the serial numbers of the missing weapons to aid with identifyin­g them once they are located. A ballistics review revealed that none of the remaining weapons are known to have been used in a crime, according to a sheriff ’s spokeswoma­n.

City insiders question whether the guns were stashed in expectatio­n that the police force would be reinstated. The department’s closure was acrimoniou­s and never fully accepted, with opponents claiming the decision was payback for police officers trying to recall then-Mayor Omar Bradley. Proponents argued that contractin­g with the Sheriff’s Department would be more affordable and effective in fighting crime.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States