U.S. STRIKES DAMASCUS
Trump orders strike on Syria in retaliation for suspected chemical weapons attack; Russian ambassador vows ‘consequences’ for strike
WASHINGTON — U.S. warships and warplanes in the eastern Mediterranean launched a fiery barrage of missiles at multiple military targets in Syria to punish the Russian-backed government in Damascus for its alleged use of poison gas against civilians last weekend, President Donald Trump announced.
Trump authorized the punitive attack against President Bashar Assad’s government and sought to cripple its chemical weapons research and production facilities with what he called precision airstrikes. French and British forces joined the attack, Trump said in a televised address Friday night.
The Pentagon said about 120 missile strikes targeted a chemical weapons research facility near Damascus, a chemical weapons storage facility west of Homs, and a separate chemical agent storage site and command post near Homs. Officials said no U.S., French or British casualties were reported.
“We are prepared to sustain this response until the Syrian regime stops its use of prohibited chemical agents,” Trump said. Loud explosions were reported in the Syrian capital as he spoke at 9 p.m. EDT in Washington. It was before dawn in Damascus.
At a subsequent Pentagon news conference, Defense Secretary James N. Mattis said that no follow-up attacks were planned, but that results of the bombardment would be reviewed. He said planners sought to avoid civilian casualties, but he could not guarantee that the attacks on poison gas stockpiles did not release toxic agents in the air.
The use of manned aircraft offshore ensured a more ambitious attack, with a more aggressive target list, than last year’s strike with 59 Tomahawk missiles on a single Syrian airfield in response to a nerve gas attack.
“Clearly the Assad regime did not get the message last year,” Mattis said. “This time our allies and we have struck harder.”
Trump promised that the United States would not maintain an indefinite presence in the war-torn region, saying that “no amount of American blood or treasure” can bring stability to the Middle East. “It is a troubled place.”
He called on Russia and Iran, which he said are the chief enablers of the Syrian government, to relinquish their support. “What kind of a nation wants to be associated with the mass murder of innocent men, women and children?” he said.
The predawn air assault Saturday raised concerns of a direct confrontation with Russia, which has an extensive network of ground-to-air missiles in Syria, as well as hundreds of troops and warplanes, and threatened to shoot down any U.S. missiles or planes that it saw as a threat.
The Pentagon’s Central Command, which oversees U.S. military operations in the Middle East, made heavy use of a special communication channel with Russia’s armed forces, called a “deconfliction line,” in recent days to gain a better picture of where Russian forces are deployed in Syria and to reassure Moscow that any U.S. strike will target only Syrian military units, facilities and equipment involved in last Saturday’s attack.
The Russian ambassador to the U.S., Anatoly Antonov, said in a statement that his country’s “warnings have been unheard. A pre-designed scenario is being implemented . ... We warned that such actions will not be left without consequences,” according to reporting by ABC News.
Trump’s Twitter posts and comments this week gave Syria time to move aircraft and troops out of likely target areas, and the advance warning made it more likely its advanced air defense batteries could shoot down U.S. cruise missiles or warplanes, complicating the Pentagon’s task of preparing a response.
The Syrian military claimed it shot down 13 missiles. There was no independent confirmation.
Syrian casualties weren’t yet known. Syrian government troops had evacuated airports and primary military air bases in government-held areas in anticipation of a U.S. air attack, and reportedly moved some Syrian warplanes to Russian-controlled airfields for protection.
Fact-finding teams from the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, an international watchdog agency based in The Hague, were expected to arrive in Douma on Saturday to collect evidence on the April 7 attack that left 43 people dead and wounded hundreds more.
U.S. officials said Syrian helicopters dropped gas-filled barrel bombs in Douma, a suburb east of Damascus. Photos and videos showed victims, including children, foaming at the mouth, choking and twitching in agony.
Local medics and rescue workers said some of the victims emitted an odor that suggested chlorine gas had been used. Others showed symptoms, including constriction of the pupils and convulsions, that suggested an illegal nerve agent such as sarin was mixed in.
The rebel-held town fell to Syrian forces after last week’s bombardment, and Russian troops also have entered the area. Thousands of rebels and civilian residents have been evacuated.
Before the latest U.S. attack, the Pentagon had raised concerns that it might not have legal justification for an assault because it hasn’t confirmed that Syrian forces used a banned nerve agent.
Use of any lethal chemical agent as a weapon, especially against civilians, is barred under international law, but unlike sarin, chlorine gas is not specifically prohibited by international treaty.
Forensic evidence from alleged victims of the Douma attack, including blood and urine samples, that the U.S. has received through intermediaries indicate the presence of chlorine gas, but evidence that a deadly nerve agent such as sarin also was used is less clear, two officials said on condition of anonymity to discuss internal assessments.
Russia has repeatedly denied that a poison gas attack occurred, saying that gruesome photographs of victims were fake.
On Friday, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov went much further, telling a staterun news site that Moscow had “irrefutable evidence” that the gas attack was a “performance” staged by a foreign spy service. He did not identify the country or show any proof for his claim.
But Maj. Gen. Igor Konashenkov, a spokesman for the Russian Defense Ministry, blamed Britain, telling reporters that London had “direct involvement,” according to Russia’s state news agency.
The British Foreign Office dismissed Moscow’s charges as “the latest in a number of ludicrous allegations from Russia, who have also said that no attack ever happened. This simply shows their desperation to pin the blame on anyone but their client: the Assad regime.”