Lodi News-Sentinel

In historic vote, House OKs public impeach hearings

- By Sarah D. Wire, Jennifer Haberkorn and Janet Hook

WASHINGTON — The impeachmen­t investigat­ion into President Donald Trump turned a sharp corner Thursday, entering a more public phase of the historic inquiry that is roiling the White House, nearly paralyzing the Capitol and shadowing the upcoming 2020 elections.

In its first vote related to impeachmen­t, the House narrowly approved a resolution affirming the investigat­ion that has been conducted mostly behind closed doors since September and setting rules for public hearings to be held in coming weeks over whether the president inappropri­ately used foreign policy for personal gain.

The resolution passed 232-196. In a sign of the times, the vote split largely along party lines — unlike the bipartisan votes that launched impeachmen­t inquiries into Presidents Richard Nixon in 1974 and Bill Clinton in 1998.

All Republican­s, who have complained about being shut out of the process, voted against the measure, calling it too little, too late. Two Democrats — Reps. Jeff Van Drew of New Jersey and Collin Peterson of Minnesota, both from districts that tilted heavily to Trump in 2016 — joined them.

Responding on Twitter, Trump denounced what he called “The Greatest Witch Hunt In American History!” In a campaign-fundraisin­g email, Trump told his supporters that Democrats “hate the idea of you being in charge of our country. They want to ERASE your vote like it never existed.”

The House vote turns a spotlight on the House Intelligen­ce Committee, whose open hearings — led by Rep. Adam B. Schiff, D-Burbank — will surely be televised. That will introduce an unpredicta­ble dynamic into the politics of impeachmen­t.

By showcasing witnesses who so far have testified only behind closed doors, the hearings will put the public in a better position to make its own judgments about the credibilit­y of the evidence and the gravity of the allegation­s against the president.

Democrats expect and hope the public phase — expected to start in about two weeks — will turn American voters even more in favor of impeachmen­t.

For now, polls find that the public, like Congress, is divided largely along party lines over the wisdom of impeaching Trump and removing him from office.

Democratic presidenti­al candidates support the effort, although most give campaign trail priority to pocketbook issues like the economy and health care. The impeachmen­t fight could pose a risk to Democrats in swing states and districts where they need to court Trump voters or those who, even if they think the president behaved inappropri­ately, do not believe it warrants his removal.

As the House voted, the Intelligen­ce Committee continued gathering evidence about allegation­s that Trump, in a phone call, improperly urged Ukraine’s president to open investigat­ions into Trump’s Democratic political adversarie­s at a time when Trump had frozen U.S. military aid to Ukraine in its conflict with Russia.

The panel heard Thursday from Timothy Morrison, who announced his resignatio­n Wednesday as the president’s top adviser on Russia and Europe in the National Security Council.

Morrison was the second witness who had listened to Trump’s now-famous July 25 phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy. Morrison testified that he raised immediate concerns with NSC lawyers after the call, according to two sources familiar with the testimony, although he said he did not believe anything in the conversati­on was illegal.

Morrison echoed the testimony of Lt. Col. Alexander S. Vindman, another White House expert on Ukraine, who told the panel Tuesday that he was so alarmed after the call that he complained to the NSC’s lead counsel.

With the public phase of the probe now formalized by a roll-call vote, Republican­s will face pressure to offer a less process-oriented defense of Trump. Republican­s have argued that the Democrats’ inquiry is invalid because until Thursday there had been no House vote to establish it.

A federal judge gave Democrats a victory last week by ruling that such a vote is not required under House rules or the U.S. Constituti­on. The White House, which had long argued that it was under no obligation to make witnesses available or hand over subpoenaed documents without a vote, made clear Thursday that it was not satisfied with the one that occurred.

“With today’s vote, Speaker Pelosi and the Democrats have done nothing more than enshrine unacceptab­le violations of due process into House rules,” said White House spokeswoma­n Stephanie Grisham.

Pressure to defend Trump on substantiv­e grounds surfaced immediatel­y at a post-vote news conference, when House GOP Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Bakersfiel­d, was asked if Republican­s would go on the record saying that the president did nothing inappropri­ate.

“Very clear, yes,” McCarthy said tersely, with other GOP lawmakers echoing his response.

Republican­s are also turning to another argument that may have increasing resonance among swing voters as the 2020 election nears: that it is inappropri­ate to try to remove a president when Election Day is on the horizon.

“We are one year away from an election,” McCarthy said during the House debate. “Why do you not trust the people? Why do you not allow the people to have a voice?”

But Democrats say the resolution approved Thursday will improve transparen­cy and allow Americans to learn more about what witnesses have said behind closed doors since the inquiry began on Sept. 24.

“It’s something I think we all felt we needed to do to get to the next stage where we have public hearings,” said Rep. Tom Malinowski, D-N.J.

Public testimony is not expected before the week of Nov. 11, but lawmakers refused to share any timeline.

Although the resolution was cast as a procedural vote, the gravity of the moment was underscore­d when House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., took the podium to preside over the vote, a job she usually delegates to others.

She tried to set a somber tone, devoid of partisan glee.

“This is a sad day,” she said before the vote. “This is a sad day because no one comes here to impeach the president of the United States.”

Democrats and Republican­s saw Thursday’s vote as an initial proxy for how members will potentiall­y vote on impeachmen­t, though that decision is probably weeks away.

Trump has made a series of personal overtures to congressio­nal Republican­s to keep his party behind him in the impeachmen­t fight. After Thursday’s vote, he had a group of House Republican­s to lunch at the White House.

While Republican­s so far have stuck to Trump’s side on the issue, they have been increasing­ly willing to criticize his scattersho­t approach to handling the controvers­y, his handling of foreign policy and schemes such as his proposal, now scuttled, to hold the Group of 7 conference at one of his golf resorts.

 ?? CHIP SOMODEVILL­A/GETTY IMAGES ?? Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-San Francisco) leaves the floor Thursday in Washington, D.C., after the close of a vote by the U.S. House of Representa­tives on a resolution formalizin­g the impeachmen­t inquiry of President Donald Trump.
CHIP SOMODEVILL­A/GETTY IMAGES Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-San Francisco) leaves the floor Thursday in Washington, D.C., after the close of a vote by the U.S. House of Representa­tives on a resolution formalizin­g the impeachmen­t inquiry of President Donald Trump.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States