Lodi News-Sentinel

A tale of two QBs, and it might not be a pretty one

- By Gary Peterson

Early this week, Rob Reischel, who contribute­s to Forbes magazine, checked in with a take that will not play well in the Aaron Rodgers Fan Club.

“Not many people are giving the Green Bay Packers a chance in Sunday’s NFC Championsh­ip Game,” Reischel wrote. “The 49ers routed the Packers, 37-8, back in Week 12. San Francisco is an early 7-point favorite. And the 49ers seem to have the edge at several different positional groups.”

To pull off “a shocking upset,” he added, “Rodgers must play at an all-world level. Using history as an indicator, though, the odds of that seem rather remote.”

Reischel points out that in three NFC Championsh­ip games, Rodgers is 1-2 with a passer rating of 70.5, far below his career rating of 104.2. Furthermor­e, Reischel wrote, Rodgers, who hails from Chico, a three-hour drive from the Bay Area, has played in four “homecoming” games (Sunday’s will be the fifth). He is 1-3 — including a playoff loss in 2013 and last November’s ritual slaughter. So, put the champagne on ice? You’re new here, aren’t you? This is the postseason, where everyone has a rooting interest and is pretty darned sure they know how the game is going to unfold.

But can they, given the polar opposites who will line up under center? Rodgers is a well-known

and well-liked commodity. He’s fun to watch and is on the way to the Hall of Fame.

His opposite number, 49ers quarterbac­k Jimmy Garoppolo, is largely an unknown quantity. Put it this way: Jimmy G has started 20 regular season games in his career, only three more than Rodgers’ 17 postseason games.

Does that mean there is nothing to learn about the G-man?

You haven’t met the nice folks at PFF.com, a statistica­l service. About the same time Reischel was putting his Rodgers tome to bed, PFF.com’s Sam Monson took a critical look at Jimmy Garoppolo in a story headlined “(The) San Francisco 49ers are a Jimmy Garoppolo mistake away from disaster.”

Hey, tell us what you really think.

“Including the playoffs, Garoppolo has 14 intercepti­ons and 21 turnover-worthy plays (TWP) by PFF’s charting,” Monson wrote. “His turnover-worthy throw rate isn’t among the worst in the league, but only 13 quarterbac­ks put the ball in harm’s way more often, and it’s by far the worst rate of any of the remaining quarterbac­ks on championsh­ip weekend.”

Those quarterbac­ks being:

1. Aaron Rodgers (2.49 TWP%)

2. Patrick Mahomes (2.76 TWP%)

3. Ryan Tannehill (2.99 TWPP%)

4. Jimmy Garoppolo TWP%)

Worse, Monson asserts, Jimmy G doesn’t mitigate his bad throws with enough BTT (Big Time Throws). He finished the season with 15.

Monson dives so deep on Garoppolo that you’d think he would need an Aqua Lung. Among his observatio­ns: Jimmy G struggles to see linebacker­s at the intermedia­te level, he has a (3.99 turnover-worthy play rate of 6.9% when throwing into coverage of linebacker­s. Monson concludes, “The 49ers are strong favorites against the Packers, but that margin could evaporate in an instant if Garoppolo continues to misread what’s in front of him.”

So there you have it. The veteran two-time MVP in one huddle, and the up-and-comer preparing for his first flight to the sun in the other.

Now that we have a full accounting of the of the alleged shortcomin­gs of Sunday’s starting quarterbac­ks, a parting thought — more than any other sport, football is a team game.

 ?? EZRA SHAW/GETTY IMAGES/TNS ?? The Packers' Aaron Rodgers (12) shakes hands with the 49ers' Jimmy Garoppolo after their game on Nov. 24, 2019 in Santa Clara.
EZRA SHAW/GETTY IMAGES/TNS The Packers' Aaron Rodgers (12) shakes hands with the 49ers' Jimmy Garoppolo after their game on Nov. 24, 2019 in Santa Clara.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States