Lodi News-Sentinel

A look at California’s unemployme­nt numbers

- DAN WALTERS CalMatters is a public interest journalism venture committed to explaining how California’s state Capitol works and why it matters. For more stories by Dan Walters, go to calmatters.org/commentary

At first glance, California’s monthly employment numbers, released last Friday, appear to indicate steady recovery from the very severe pandemic-spawned recession.

California’s unemployme­nt rate declined from 13.5% in July to 11.4% in August, reflecting a nearly 300,000 gain in employment.

A closer look at the data tells another story.

Much of the gain was government­al and seasonal, such as thousands of temporary federal workers to conduct the decennial census and school and college employees returning to their jobs as classes resume. Permanent hiring by private employers was scant, just 35,000 according to an analysis by Beacon Economics and the UCR School of Business Center for Economic Forecastin­g and Developmen­t.

“Moreover, the unemployme­nt rate fell for the wrong reasons,” the Beacon-UCR analysis declared, citing a sharp decline in the state’s labor force of working or job-seeking adults.

Over the past year, according to the state Employment Developmen­t Department (EDD), the labor force declined by 710,000 persons. The dropouts are not working but are not counted as unemployed in the official calculatio­n. Including them would boost real unemployme­nt to 2.8 million workers and the state’s real rate to about 15%.

Even California’s official unemployme­nt rate of 11.4%, as misleading as it may be, is substantia­lly higher than the national rate of 8.4% and is the fifth highest in the nation.

By happenstan­ce, 24 hours after California’s employment data were issued, a “strike force” created by Gov. Gavin Newsom released its much-awaited report on the immense backlog of unemployme­nt insurance claims in the Employment Developmen­t Department.

The 109-page report officially confirms what had been obvious for months, that EDD was woefully unprepared for the tsunami of benefit claims that followed Newsom’s orders to shut down much of the state’s economy to battle COVID-19.

“Based on data of new claim filings, California’s current backlog of undetermin­ed claims is growing by at least 10,000 claims per day,” the report said. “Given the state of the economy and the likelihood of future legislatio­n, executive orders, or other policy to support workers, it’s reasonable to assume inbound claim rates will not abate in the foreseeabl­e future.”

The key phrase is “given the state of the economy,” implying that California’s economic woes will continue indefinite­ly and that EDD will be sorely pressed to keep up.

In fact, the backlog is so severe that in response to the report, EDD declared a two-week moratorium on processing new claims to give its workers a chance to catch up on 1.6 million unprocesse­d claims, some of which have dangled for months.

Newsom semi-ignored the unemployme­nt insurance crisis for many weeks and only intervened with his strike team when legislator­s, whose offices had been deluged with pleas for help from frustrated claimants, were on the verge of revolt.

The Great Recession that erupted 13 years ago had demonstrat­ed EDD’s bureaucrat­ic ossificati­on, lack of up-to-date technology and other shortcomin­gs, but Newsom’s two predecesso­rs,

Arnold Schwarzene­gger and Jerry Brown, ignored the warnings.

Interestin­gly, the strike team report noted that EDD has been planning a technology upgrade for three years but has not actually commission­ed new software or hardware. It recommende­d that the project be abandoned, its staff be diverted to dealing with the current crisis and that the technology overhaul be restarted from scratch.

EDD has now succeeded the much-maligned Department of Motor Vehicles in the pantheon of official mismanagem­ent, but there’s a big difference. DMV’s failings are annoying, but EDD’s claims backlog can inflict real pain on families as they attempt to keep roofs over their heads and food on their tables.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States