Lodi News-Sentinel

New drawings show how high-speed rail will look, but it’s billions short and years from reality

- Colleen Shalby LOS ANGELES TIMES

high-speed rail train could feature an indoor play area for children and seating options that would allow people to meet as a group or cocoon in a reading nook. Recently released drawings of the imagined interior, station platforms and a video walkthroug­h of a model train car offered a glimpse into the future of the transit system and its promise to transform the state.

But how — and if — it will ever live up to that promise to connect Los Angeles to San Francisco by train in less than three hours still remains unknown. While some progress has been made in the last 15 years, the timeline for completion has moved back by more than a decade and cost estimates have grown by the billions.

Transit experts and state policy advisers have continued to question how the lofty project will be paid for as the proposed cost has increased without guaranteed funding sources. Projected ridership has also dipped since the pandemic.

“Schedules are stretching out, demand estimates have fallen and financing is inadequate and unstable,” said high-speed rail peer-review group chair Louis Thompson at a recent state legislativ­e hearing. The state-appointed panel advises the California High-Speed Rail Authority.

Rail Authority Chief Executive Brian Kelly, who plans to step down this year, and other rail officials have also acknowledg­ed the questionab­le funding of a rail system with less than a quarter of its length under constructi­on three years after the the first phase was supposed to be completed.

Here’s where things stand:

When will the train start running and

where will it go?

Voters first approved a high-speed rail proposal in 2008 that would connect Los Angeles to San Francisco by 2020. That end date has changed considerab­ly over time.

In its latest projection, the rail authority goal is for the 494-mile system, which includes a line from Los Angeles to Anaheim, to serve riders by 2040. But that timeline is not set.

The current focus centers on the Central Valley, where officials estimate the 171-mile line from Merced to Bakersfiel­d will be finished between 2030 and 2033.

There are currently 119 miles under constructi­on stretching from Madera to Shafter. An environmen­tal review cleared the expansion to Merced and Bakersfiel­d, but the authority has not yet fully secured funding to do so.

While constructi­on has been a boon for the area that was hard-hit by the Great Recession when the rail system was passed, bringing in more than 12,000 jobs to the Central Valley, the train has been out of sight for much of the state.

“We’re starting in the most underpopul­ated portion of the route,” said Ethan Elkind, director of the climate program at UC Berkeley Law’s Center for Law, Energy and the Environmen­t. “The voters and the taxpayers in the [more] populated areas see no benefit from the system.”

There’s economic and social advantages for connecting areas in the Central Valley to “thriving coastal economies because we have a very unequal society in California,” Elkind said. But no one knows when that will definitive­ly happen.

Officials expect that the 463-mile stretch between Los Angeles and San Francisco will be environmen­tally cleared by May, pending approval of a key section between

Palmdale and Burbank. Funding for that additional constructi­on has not been locked down.

The high-speed rail peer-review group has recommende­d the Legislatur­e commission an “independen­t review of the economic and financial justificat­ion for the project” before “recommitti­ng” to the first phase.

How much will the project cost?

Officials estimate it could cost about $35 billion to finish the first line from Bakersfiel­d to Merced and roughly $100 billion more to complete the route from Los Angeles to San Francisco — about $100 billion more than what was originally proposed years ago. And the source of most funds is unclear.

High-speed rail developmen­t relies on state and federal funding and California’s cap-andtrade incentive, which is set to expire in 2030. The authority hopes to secure private investment­s in the future, according to its most recent business plan, but currently uses none.

The outcome of the November election could have an effect on future funding.

“We want a federal partner that celebrates California and that celebrates what high-speed rail not only brings to our state, but really, to our nation,” state assembly Transporta­tion Chair Lori D. Wilson (D-Suisun City) said.

The Trump administra­tion previously tried to pull back funding for the project, while the Biden administra­tion has been more supportive. It recently awarded the state more than $3 billion for the project, which will go toward the completion of the Central Valley line.

The authority is still about $7 billion short for what’s needed to finish the Central Valley line, in addition to the tens of billions of dollars needed to fund the rest of the route.

“There is no source of that money right now,” Thompson told The Times. “If and when they reach the point where they want to get out of the Central Valley, then the state itself is going to have to find a lot more money.”

Once the first line is complete, a second phase is supposed to connect Merced to Sacramento and Los Angeles to San Diego, expanding the line to about 800 miles.

Why the delay?

Transit experts have said the mega-project launched before it was ready to. As Thompson told the Legislatur­e in 2019, “we got the cart before the horse.”

Kelly acknowledg­ed the misstep at a recent hearing.

“It got federal monies to start in a specific location and those dollars had to be spent under an unrealisti­c timeline,” he said. “The authority wanted to advance work to keep the federal dollars which was understand­able, but in so doing, it got into constructi­on before some of the pre-constructi­on activities were done.”

The rail authority essentiall­y tried to learn how to develop the country’s first high-speed rail system in real time.

“They were hiring consultant­s, they were getting sued, they were spending a lot of money and nothing was getting built,” Elkind said.

 ?? CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED RAIL AUTHORITY/TNS ?? A rendering of California’s high-speed rail.
CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED RAIL AUTHORITY/TNS A rendering of California’s high-speed rail.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States