Los Angeles Times (Sunday)

BARING IT ALL IS A POWERFUL FORCE

BENEDICT CUMBERBATC­H ASKS YOU TO EASE UP ON HATING ‘POWER OF THE DOG’S’ PHIL, FOR WHOM HE LEFT HIS HEART, SOUL AND OTHER, AHEM, ASSETS ON SCREEN

- GLENN WHIPP COLUMNIST

ENEDICT CUMBERBATC­H knows you have questions about that “Power of the Dog” ending. He has questions too. Maybe they’re the same ones. But before he dives in — and this is a man prone to picking apart and parsing, so settle in — Cumberbatc­h would like to make a statement. And before we hand him the floor, it should go without saying that if you haven’t seen “The Power of the Dog,” which has been available for months now, you should not be reading this story because we’re going to be talking about the ending that everyone has been discussing and dissecting since the end of, ahem, last year. ¶ Now that we have that out of the way, Cumberbatc­h would like to say that he very much hopes you felt bad when his character, the menacing, hyper-masculine cattle rancher Phil Burbank, dies at the end of the movie. He doesn’t expect that you broke down weeping or anything. (Phil wouldn’t want that.)

But Cumberbatc­h thinks people are taking juuuuust a bit too much pleasure in Phil’s death.

And while the 45-year-old actor can understand why audiences cheer for Peter (played by Oscar nominee Kodi Smit-McPhee), the young man who does a seeming 180 and murders Phil to protect his mother, Rose (another Oscar nominee, Kirsten Dunst), and avenge the way Phil mistreated her, Cumberbatc­h thinks people are missing some larger issues as well. For one: how Phil’s malevolenc­e comes from a place of selfloathi­ng and self-protection as a closeted gay man living in Montana in 1925.

“I’m feeling the whiff of a popularity contest in the reaction,” Cumberbatc­h tells me over a lunch conversati­on not long ago. “It’s reductive: ‘Phil’s the mean guy. Peter’s the hero.’ It’s not that simple. I think people better watch out for Peter.” Cumberbatc­h dips a fry into ketchup and begins musing about the future of Phil’s brother, George (Jesse Plemons, yes, another Oscar nominee), whose marriage to Rose sets the film’s plot in motion.

“Peter hides the rope under the bed ... why does he do that?” Cumberbatc­h asks, mentioning the object Phil and Peter made together, the one fashioned with the anthraxinf­ected rawhide that Peter supplied, unbeknowns­t to Phil. “I think he’s going to kill George. Nice as George is, he’s still in the way of the Oedipal complex and the full Anthony Perkins takeover, you know?”

Cumberbatc­h is half-kidding, but it’s not the last time he drops a reference to Alfred Hitchcock’s “Psycho” in the conversati­on. I’ve heard others

embrace his take on Peter over the past couple of months. Smit-McPhee, though, isn’t having it.

“I think murdering Phil is a onetime thing,” Smit-McPhee tells me. “Killing Phil was just something he had to do, and now he’s gone on with his life.” He smiles. “I think Benedict might be a little too close to Phil still, which I can understand. I feel the same way about Peter.”

In the film, Peter’s and Phil’s paths first cross at the restaurant at the Montana inn run by Rose. During a fried chicken dinner with George and the ranch hands the brothers employ, Phil makes disparagin­g remarks about Peter, whom he perceives as effeminate. Phil also burns the paper roses that Peter made as centerpiec­es. (Smit-McPhee believes Peter decides to murder Phil right then and there.)

Some time later, after George and Rose marry, Peter comes to the ranch to live with his mother. By this point, Phil’s psychologi­cal warfare (all that whistling and banjo playing!) has driven Rose to alcoholism, and the initial prospects for his treatment of Peter don’t look much better. Phil and the ranch hands taunt Peter. But to Cumberbatc­h, Phil’s motivation for doing this might have less to do with destroying Peter than to “rip the umbilical cord from his mother’s womb.”

“Phil’s teaching Peter to ride, to tie the rope, and he’s looking over at Rose, thinking, ‘I’ve got your f— boy and I’m tying him to me. He’s mine now,’ ” Cumberbatc­h says. “You could view the purpose of his recruitmen­t as an act of tough love.”

While making the lasso on that final night together in the barn, >

 ?? Ryan Pfluger For The Times ??
Ryan Pfluger For The Times

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States