Justice Thomas decries leak

Publication of draft opinion changes the high court and signals a loss of trust, he says.

WASHINGTON — Justice Clarence Thomas says the Supreme Court has been changed by the leak of a draft opinion earlier this month. The opinion suggests the court is poised to overturn the right to abortion recognized nearly 50 years ago in Roe vs. Wade.

The conservative justice, who joined the court in 1991 and has long called for Roe vs. Wade to be overturned, described the leak as an unthinkable breach of trust.

“When you lose that trust, especially in the institution that I’m in, it changes the institution fundamentally. You begin to look over your shoulder. It’s, like, kind of an infidelity that you can explain it, but you can’t undo it,” Thomas said while speaking at a conference Friday in Dallas.

The court has said the draft does not represent the final position of any of the justices, and Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. has ordered an investigation into the leak.

Thomas, who was appointed by President George H.W. Bush, said it was beyond “anyone’s imagination” before the May 2 leak of the opinion to Politico that even a line of a draft opinion would be released in advance, much less an entire draft that runs nearly 100 pages.

Politico has also reported that in addition to Thomas, conservative Justices Neil M. Gorsuch, Brett M. Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett had voted with the draft opinion’s author, Samuel A. Alito Jr., to overrule Roe vs. Wade and a 1992 decision, Planned Parenthood vs. Casey, that affirmed Roe’s finding of a constitutional right to abortion.

Thomas said that in the past, “if someone said that one line of one opinion” would be leaked, the response would have been, “Oh, that’s impossible. No one would ever do that.”

“Now that trust or that belief is gone forever,” Thomas said at the Old Parkland Conference, which describes itself as a forum “to discuss alternative proven approaches to tackling the challenges facing Black Americans today.”

Thomas also said: “I do think that what happened at the court is tremendously bad . ... I wonder how long we’re going to have these institutions at the rate we’re undermining them.”

He also touched on the protests by liberals at conservative justices’ homes in Maryland and Virginia that followed the draft opinion’s release.

Thomas contended that conservatives have never acted that way.

“You would never visit Supreme Court justices’ houses when things didn’t go our way. We didn’t throw temper tantrums. I think it is ... incumbent on us to always act appropriately and not to repay tit for tat,” he said.

Neither Thomas nor any attendees at the Dallas session made mention of the Jan. 6 insurrection or the actions of the justice’s wife, Virginia, in fighting to have the results of the 2020 presidential election overturned.

Thomas was speaking before an audience as part of a conversation with John Yoo, a UC Berkeley School of Law professor who worked for him as a law clerk for a year in the early 1990s.

Each justice generally has four law clerks every year; the current group has been a focus of speculation as a possible source of the draft opinion’s leak. The clerks are one of a few groups, along with the justices and some administrative staff, with access to draft opinions.

Thomas answered a few questions from the audience, including one from a man who asked about the friendships between liberal and conservative justices on the court, such as the wellknown friendship between the late liberal Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and the late conservative Justice Antonin Scalia.

“How can we foster that same type of relationship within Congress and within the general population?” he asked.

“Well, I’m just worried about keeping it at the court now,” Thomas said.

He spoke in glowing terms about his former colleagues, adding that “this is not the court of that era.”