Los Angeles Times (Sunday)

Self-sabotage of speaker bans

-

Re “Israel to Berkeley to Twitter,” Opinion, Nov. 20

In his op-ed article, UC Berkeley School of Law Dean Erwin Chemerinsk­y doesn’t mention that eight student affinity groups besides the Law Students for Justice in Palestine amended their bylaws to ban pro-Zionism speakers.

Many of the student group leaders who signed on to this ban know very little about the IsraeliPal­estinian conflict. Neverthele­ss, they signed on because they were persuaded by a virulently antiIsrael group that it was in the interest of social justice.

Furthermor­e the signatorie­s, as a requiremen­t of the bylaw, were obliged to attend a training session called “Palestine 101,” another step in their indoctrina­tion.

The banning of speakers on the basis of national identity or political view does not bode well for the intellectu­al climate of a law school. Shouldn’t that be the very place for debate and dialogue?

The boycotters, satisfied with one side of the story, are shortchang­ing themselves as far as inquiry, discussion and the resulting knowledge are concerned. Anne Chomyn Altadena

I am glad that Chemerinsk­y has written an op-ed article for The Times defending the 1st Amendment right of anti-racist student organizati­ons to decide not to host speakers that support Israeli apartheid. He was right to do so, and his analysis of the law is correct.

However, I was disappoint­ed that while he paid considerab­le attention to the feelings of Jewish community members about the pledge, he totally ignored how Palestinia­ns on campus might feel when Zionist organizati­ons make their political commitment­s known.

For example, Berkeley Hillel, which claims to be the heart of Jewish life on campus, has a very similar policy effectivel­y prohibitin­g itself from hosting anti-Zionist speakers, which would ban the vast majority of Palestinia­ns.

By only considerin­g how these issues affect Jewish students and ignoring Palestinia­ns, Chemerinsk­y is contributi­ng to the dehumaniza­tion of Palestinia­ns that often plagues these debates.

Dylan Saba Brooklyn, N.Y. The writer, an alumnus of the UC Berkeley School of Law, is a staff attorney for Palestine Legal.

While Chemerinsk­y “knows of no instance in which any speaker has been excluded based on religion or viewpoints about Israel,” the bylaw bars any speakers who “have expressed and continued to hold views or host/sponsor/promote events in support of Zionism, the apartheid state of Israel, and the occupation of Palestine.”

This goes beyond saying that no group that adopted the bylaw would run programs praising Israel’s many contributi­ons to the world.

The bylaw decrees that support for the existence of the Jewish state in the Jews’ ancestral homeland is so abominable that, for instance, Alan Dershowitz, a Zionist, would not be invited to speak on the role of the defense in a criminal case.

Toby F. Block Atlanta

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States