Los Angeles Times (Sunday)

Puppy’s euthanasia to be investigat­ed

- By Alexandra E. Petri Times staff writer Noah Goldberg contribute­d to this report.

Bowie was a scruffy-looking terrier puppy with hazel eyes who found himself at the Baldwin Park animal shelter waiting for weeks to be rescued.

When the 4-month-old was euthanized Dec. 4, his death prompted a public outcry that led to a call for an investigat­ion into how pet homes are found and animals destroyed at the county’s seven shelters.

The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisor­s last week ordered the agency to investigat­e the puppy’s death. Members also approved a motion to reduce euthanasia of animals in the county’s custody.

The motion by Supervisor­s Hilda L. Solis and Janice Hahn said an employee in the county’s Department of Animal Care and Control “erroneousl­y authorized the euthanasia of a … puppy named Bowie at the Baldwin Park Animal Care Center,” sparking outrage among residents. Bowie was surrendere­d by his owner to the Baldwin Park shelter on Nov. 10 and euthanized on Dec. 4, the agency said.

The motion, which was approved unanimousl­y Tuesday, gives the department 30 days to produce a “full accounting” of what led to Bowie’s death. The board also gave the agency 90 days to create a five-year plan to lower its euthanasia rates.

The plan must have “built-in, annual benchmarks,” including detailed reports on animals that are put down, recommenda­tions on how to decrease euthanasia rates and an analysis of the feasibilit­y of a 90% rate of saving animals.

“We can and must do better to save the innocent animals that come into the county’s care,” Solis said in a statement.

An investigat­ion led by the agency’s human resources division was underway prior to the board’s motion and began “as soon as the euthanasia of Bowie was discovered,” said Frank Corvino, deputy director of the department’s South County Operations.

“While that investigat­ion is not yet complete, we will be examining every step in Bowie’s stay, and any identified errors will be promptly and thoroughly addressed,” Corvino said. “The department takes the euthanasia of animals very seriously and has made this incident a top priority for investigat­ion and response, including any necessary corrective action of personnel.”

According to the board’s motion, between July 1 and Nov. 30, Los Angeles County Animal Care and Control, one of the largest animal control agencies in the United States, put down roughly 30% of the 12,550 animals in its care. That’s more than the city of Los Angeles, which in October achieved an estimated animal salvation rate of 87%.

This occurred despite Animal Care and Control’s “socially conscious animal sheltering” policy that includes finding shelters and care for “safe and healthy” animals, according to the supervisor­s’ motion.

“The death of Bowie demonstrat­ed that despite this policy, many animals are not being successful­ly placed with viable adopters or rescues,” the officials wrote. “It is time for the county to rethink its animal care strategy to maximize the number of animals that find their forever homes.”

Marcia Mayeda, the agency’s director, told The Times in a Dec. 15 email that 21 dogs, including Bowie, were put down at the Baldwin Park location on Dec. 4 and 5, including three “irremediab­ly suffering” from severe illness or injury.

Four were deemed unsafe for adoption because of aggressive behavior; nine could not be placed after the agency “exhausted all possibilit­ies,” including announceme­nts on social media and pleas to rescue groups. Five, including Bowie, had “very concerning” behaviors and could be released only to rescue organizati­ons for rehabilita­tion. Many of the dogs that were euthanized were in the agency’s care for 24 to 122 days, Mayeda said.

Bowie was at the shelter for 24 days and “exhibited extreme fear and fearful aggression” that did not improve, Mayeda said, adding that he could be turned over only to a rescue group because he required socializat­ion and special training.

Bowie and the four other rescue-only dogs were featured on the agency’s website, and no rescue group inquired about any of them, Mayeda said.

“Neverthele­ss, the staff did not send proactive rescue pleas for these five dogs prior to euthanizat­ion,” Mayeda said.

When a dog is at risk for euthanasia, pleas are sent directly to hundreds of adoption programs within the agency’s network. Up to three pleas can be sent, including an urgent 72-hour plea. The agency confirmed that it never sent a plea about Bowie.

Underdog Heroes, a rescue group in Southern California that specialize­s in bully breeds, said it asked about Bowie. In an email shared with The Times, Underdog Heroes wrote to the agency on Dec. 4 at 3:40 p.m., asking if Bowie “was still in need of rescue.” The group’s members learned about Bowie after a prospectiv­e adopter contacted them on Instagram, Shoshi Gamliel, the president, said.

Corvino said the department “did not know Underdog Heroes was interested in rescuing Bowie, and that informatio­n had not been communicat­ed until after Bowie had been euthanized.”

According to Bowie’s file, a copy of which Underdog shared with The Times, an employee whose name was redacted recommende­d that the dog be euthanized around 8:40 a.m. on Dec. 4, with a message saying a “[registered veterinary technician] is requested to advise immediatel­y if there is any reason noted not to proceed as recommende­d.”

A note shows the vet tech confirming the details in Bowie’s records. The county verified that the file copy was genuine.

Bowie was put down at 10:40 a.m., the document shows.

Mayeda said instructio­ns to put down Bowie and the four other rescue-only dogs came from one employee “with the authority to make that decision.”

Gamliel said Animal Care and Control’s website is unreliable, often with poor photos or inaccurate informatio­n about dog breeds and ages. Underdog Heroes typically learns of rescue opportunit­ies through pleas from the shelters, she said. She added that Baldwin Park is particular­ly difficult to work with.

Corvino countered that the shelter has been “very responsive to requests from [active adoption partners and rescue groups] who may need additional time even past a 72-hour notice.

“As a department we have looked for ways to accelerate a release to an adoption partner,” Corvino added. He pointed to an updated adoption and rescue process, the online database accessible to approved organizati­ons and the department’s practice of sending pleas for homes for at-risk dogs before decisions are made.

“Bowie was important to us,” Gamliel said. “It was a hurtful situation, because he was a puppy, and there is no way to even justify it. Fear is not a reason to euthanize a dog, ever, especially when it’s a puppy.”

‘Fear is not a reason to euthanize a dog, ever, especially when it’s a puppy.’

— Shoshi Gamliel, president of the rescue group Underdog Heroes

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States