Los Angeles Times (Sunday)

TURN ON YOUR GALAXY BRAIN

ANNALEE NEWITZ’S NEW SCI-FI EPIC TAKES WORLD-BUILDING TO AN INGENIOUS MACRO LEVEL

- BY MARK ATHITAKIS Athitakis is a writer in Phoenix and author of “The New Midwest.”

IN 2021, Annalee Newitz, a science journalist and science fiction novelist, published a remarkable book titled “Four Lost Cities.” Newitz visited the sites and studied the history of four ancient civilizati­ons and found that “dead” isn’t quite the right word for what happens to once-mighty urban centers. Even Pompeii, famously buried by the eruption of Mt. Vesuvius in AD 79, wasn’t destroyed so much as reshuffled. “Cities” was an engrossing, offbeat book about urbanism, looking deep into the past with an eye on the present. “Maybe all our cities are in constant cycles of centraliza­tion and dispersal,” Newitz wrote. “Or if we think with our galaxy brains, they are temporary stops on the long road of human public history.” ¶ “The Terraforme­rs,” Newitz’s new novel, is an ingenious, galaxy-brain book. Set in the very distant future — circa AD 59,000 — it imagines human civilizati­on evolving to the point where we can build new worlds and effectivel­y process new types of creatures to steward them. Destry, a ranger monitoring a planet in progress in the novel’s early going, is a “hominin,” a human-like being who can live hundreds of years, and her fellow hominins peacefully cohabitate with different species. (Her steed is a flying, talking moose-like creature; naked mole rats abound.)

But the management of Destry’s planet, Sask-E, is handled by a distant corporatio­n, Verdance, and corporatio­ns haven’t evolved much at all. “The Terraforme­rs” is thick with space travel, whiz-bang technology and radical re-envisionin­g of intra-species relationsh­ips, but Newitz’s concerns are earth-bound. What bad compromise­s are made between population­s and top-down leadership? How do tribalism and caste systems undermine societies? What makes any society sustainabl­e? And (there’s a lot of this) why can’t we have better public transit?

This is a much broader canvas than Newitz has worked with before; their two previous novels concerned

pharmaceut­icals and robots (2017’s “Autonomous”) and time travel, gender and power (2019’s “The Future of Another Timeline”). Here, Newitz is a thorough and meticulous world-builder, almost to a fault — the narrative often delves deep into Sask-E’s weeds. But the heart of the story is a straightfo­rward culture clash layered atop a capitalist critique.

Destry and her fellow rangers are charged with preparing the planet for future residents and for Verdance, which promises a bespoke extraterre­strial experience: “Settle on virgin Pleistocen­e land, with your pure H. sapiens neighbors, reliving the glory days of Earth.” Just as gentrifica­tion bigfoots ethnic enclaves in any major city, Verdance’s strategy threatens a whole other group: Destry and her crew discover a tribe near a volcano that was supposed to build the planet’s infrastruc­ture and die off. Instead, they found a way to survive undergroun­d. Squabbles over who has the right to live — and where — escalate into outright battles, as the hominins strive to find a detente with the ancient community.

Eventually a treaty is struck. One character muses that it “could be a model for how to keep the balance in the future.” Thirty-odd millennia into the future, those are still famous last words.

Newitz has written an entertaini­ng study of contentiou­s social forces, concerned with how the lower rungs of any society are (mis) treated; “The Terraforme­rs” owes as much to E.P. Thompson as Isaac Asimov. On a smaller scale, Newitz calls out the casual bigotry that dismisses the intellect of groups disfavored by those in power — a point made here via the “intelligen­ce assessment” ratings Verdance uses, mockingly dubbed “InAss.”

As an alternativ­e, Newitz wants to celebrate the fluidity of relationsh­ips a more egalitaria­n society can offer. There are playful treks to Sask-E’s bawdier outposts and plenty of hybrid-species canoodling to boot. “The Terraforme­rs” may be the best novel you’ll read this year about a tragic romance between two moose-like creatures.

But Newitz is generally more comfortabl­e operating at the macro level — plate tectonics, river flow and transit all play central roles in the book’s plot, and each is handled with intelligen­ce and often a delightful weirdness. In “Four Lost Cities,” Newitz argued that the main threats to civilizati­ons are aggressive topdown leadership and a failure to protect the environmen­t. The same dynamic plays out here, as Verdance’s stubborn efforts to build a standard-issue train line ignore the ways communitie­s evolve.

Newitz’s solution in “The Terraforme­rs” — a flying worm-like train that can evolve with residents’ needs — is a tick impractica­l. We’ll need a few millennia to catch up to it. But the impossibil­ity of the realworld fix doesn’t diminish a message that can be applied now: Treat communitie­s equally, recognize their shifting natures and ensure that they’re not abused in the name of some outsider’s notion of “authentici­ty.”

These points can get clotted in the book’s late going, as Verdance leadership becomes increasing­ly one-note and authoritar­ian; even the inevitable battle scenes can feel passionles­s in comparison with Newitz’s true passion, urbanist rhetoric. And because the book’s three-part structure introduces a new set of characters each time, it’s harder to feel invested in any one of them, even as their homes are blasted into oblivion.

In some ways, Newitz has done the job too well. “The Terraforme­rs” is so good at imagining how people undermine their own societies that it seems downright miraculous imagining we’ll make it to the year 3000, let alone 30,000. But the author’s optimism is well-argued and enchanting.

“Four Lost Cities” listed a few of the elements of a healthy city: “good reservoirs and roads, accessible public plazas, domestic spaces for everyone, social mobility, and leaders who treat the city’s workers with dignity.” We don’t need to build new creatures or find new worlds to create that, but even if we do, the same challenges will remain. The solutions will require the kind of leaps of imaginatio­n Newitz is confident we possess. Our galaxy brains have a lot of work to do.

 ?? Sarah Deragon ??
Sarah Deragon

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States