Los Angeles Times (Sunday)

Adultery would become legal in New York with repeal of 1907 law

- BY ANTHONY IZAGUIRRE Izaguirre writes for the Associated Press.

ALBANY, N.Y. — For more than a century, it has been a crime to cheat on your spouse in New York.

But adultery may soon be legal in the Empire State thanks to a bill working its way through the New York Legislatur­e, which would finally repeal the seldom-used law that is punishable by up to three months behind bars.

Adultery bans are still on the books in several states, though charges are rare and conviction­s even rarer. They were traditiona­lly enacted to reduce the number of divorces at a time when a cheating spouse was the only way to secure a legal split.

Adultery, a misdemeano­r in New York since 1907, is defined in state code as when a person “engages in sexual intercours­e with another person at a time when he has a living spouse, or the other person has a living spouse.”

Just a few weeks after it took effect, a married man and a 25-year-old woman were the first arrested under the new law after the man’s wife sued for divorce, according to a New York Times article from the time.

Only about a dozen people have been charged under New York’s law since 1972, and of those, just five cases have netted conviction­s, according to state Assemblyma­n Charles Lavine, who sponsored the bill to appeal the ban. The last adultery charge in New York appears to have been filed in 2010 against a woman who was caught engaging in a sex act in a public park, but it was later dropped as part of a plea deal.

Lavine says it’s time to throw out the law given that it’s never enforced and because prosecutor­s shouldn’t be digging into what willing adults do behind closed doors.

“It just makes no sense whatsoever and we’ve come a long way since intimate relationsh­ips between consenting adults are considered immoral,” the Democrat said. “It’s a joke. This law was someone’s expression of moral outrage.”

Katharine B. Silbaugh, a law professor at Boston University who co-wrote “A Guide to America’s Sex Laws,” said adultery bans were punitive measures aimed at women, intended to discourage extramarit­al affairs that could throw a child’s parentage into question.

“Let’s just say this: patriarchy,” Silbaugh said.

New York’s bill to repeal its ban has already passed the Assembly and is expected to soon pass the Senate before it can move to the governor’s office.

The law almost was removed from the books in the 1960s after a state commission tasked with updating the entire penal code found the ban practicall­y impossible to enforce. The commission’s leader was quoted at the time as saying, “This is a matter of private morality, not of law.”

The panel’s changes were initially accepted in the Assembly, but the chamber restored the adultery law after a politician argued its eliminatio­n might appear as though the state was endorsing infidelity, according to a 1965 New York Times article.

Another Times article from the period also detailed resistance from at least one religious group that argued adultery undermined marriages and the common good. The penal code changes were eventually signed into law, with the adultery ban intact.

Most states that still have adultery laws classify them as misdemeano­rs, but Oklahoma, Wisconsin and Michigan treat adultery as felonies. Several states, including Colorado and New Hampshire, have moved to repeal their adultery laws, using similar arguments as Assemblyma­n Lavine’s.

There also are lingering questions over whether adultery bans are even constituti­onal. A 2003 Supreme Court decision that struck down sodomy laws cast doubt on whether adultery laws could pass muster, with then-Justice Antonin Scalia writing in his dissent that the court’s ruling put the bans in question.

However, in the court’s landmark 2022 decision that stripped away abortion protection­s, Justice Clarence Thomas wrote that the Supreme Court “should reconsider ” its sodomy law decision, as well as its decision legalizing same-sex marriage, in light of its newer interpreta­tion of constituti­onal protection­s around liberty and privacy.

The high court’s hypothetic­al stance on adultery laws might be mostly academic given how rare it is for such a charge to be filed.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States