Los Angeles Times (Sunday)

Solving homelessne­ss: L.A.’s left-right split

-

Homelessne­ss will remain intractabl­e until our nation addresses economic inequality. We need moral outrage.

Here in L.A., we construct tiny-home villages with 64 square feet of living space and estates in Bel-Air with 30,000.

I commend the mayor’s efforts, but this kind of discrepanc­y in living conditions has led to revolution­s and land reform. Let’s figure this out before it gets bloody. Lisa Dieckmann

Los Angeles

As rents and house prices go up, take note — someone is raking in all that money. That’s where our government leaders should focus their attention.

As long as real estate investors are asking for higher profits, rents will keep going up, and more people will find themselves unable to afford shelter. It’s the typical corporate strategy: Plunder the environmen­t to gain all the riches, and let the public pay for the aftermath.

We need to end the eviction of people from their homes so landlords and developers can build something more expensive and reap greater profits. Let’s regulate the profits that real estate investors can make.

We get daily informatio­n about encampment­s and the plight of neighborho­ods and how much the public is paying to house people. We see it for ourselves. Tell us more about the other end of the scale, where the riches pile up. Sarah Starr

Los Angeles

Many years after recovering from homelessne­ss and building a great life, I started working on the streets, first in San Francisco and now in Los Angeles, bringing essentials such as hygiene, laundry, haircuts and clothing to people who had lost their homes.

My return from homelessne­ss happened when I was surrounded by a community that shared my experience­s and stayed with me through every mistake I made, building resilience that made it possible for me to thrive.

Community is the one thing that I know works; it has worked in my life, and it has worked for millions of others. It’s the inspiratio­n for everything I do today. Community is the only way we will end homelessne­ss in L.A.

Hundreds of thousands of Angelenos are one paycheck or illness away from being unhoused. According to L.A. County officials, more than 220 people here lose their homes every day. The path back to housing for the hardest-hit has become more deadly and more treacherou­s.

The agencies tasked with helping these people are overwhelme­d. Big agencies can’t do this; they never could.

It will take us, the millions of Angelenos who share this beautiful place, the community groups, faith communitie­s and neighbors, to rise up and say we will no longer accept this suffering. We know the answer is us, but can we set aside our difference­s and unite to end this? Paul Asplund

Pasadena

So many studies blame the lack of affordable housing — and all housing — as the primary contributo­r to homelessne­ss. I live in an area of single-family homes and know that zoning protecting this kind of neighborho­od must end.

It’s not a choice between skyscraper­s and single-family homes. There are many alternativ­es — look at what Santa Monica is doing with mixeduse, mid-rise residentia­l buildings.

Additional­ly, we need quality care and sufficient funding for drug and mental health programs. This is a complicate­d problem that needs a multi-pronged approach and time to solve. Karin Costello

Santa Monica

What drives homelessne­ss? In a nutshell, housing policies that reward real estate investors and developers; the scarcity of transition­al housing for institutio­nalized individual­s; consistent­ly low wages; increasing numbers of seniors on low fixed incomes; a dearth of “affordable” housing; and the resulting mental health, substance use and medical challenges.

This is not just my opinion; it’s what the UC San Francisco Benioff Homelessne­ss and Housing Initiative study found last year.

In L.A., Mayor Karen Bass’ Inside Safe initiative aims to bring individual­s living in encampment­s into hotel and motel rooms. However, because of the scarcity of lowincome permanent housing (and permanent supportive housing), these people end up living in temporary shelters for years. Temporary shelters have become a revolving door, moving individual­s in and out.

Local agencies are not able to provide services and housing to the increasing number of individual­s living on the street. So unhoused individual­s become chronicall­y homeless and have a much harder time adapting to societal expectatio­ns.

Once individual­s become unhoused, it is difficult for them to find housing again. Their mental health suffers as a result of the trauma of becoming homeless, and they may begin using substances to help them cope.

The need for “affordable” housing has been proposed for decades. On the surface, Bass’ effort to significan­tly streamline constructi­on for affordable housing seems like a good idea.

But Bass’ initiative does not provide subsidized housing, prevent displaceme­nt of low-income tenants or provide actual “affordable” housing. Rather, it caters to the myth that building housing for people at 80% of local median income will magically lower rents throughout the city.

Thus, Bass’ streamlini­ng effort is another failed housing policy that will not appreciabl­y help to increase housing production for homeless and low-income individual­s. Jane Demian

Los Angeles

The number of people experienci­ng homelessne­ss has gone up in Los Angeles, and the city is becoming a very different place from the one in which I grew up.

As a lifelong resident of South Los Angeles, I wish city and county leaders knew how the different initiative­s passed by voters have been perceived by residents. We are tired of voting on ballot measures that have seemingly little to no impact.

The only thing I have seen improve the situation is the Inside Safe program, which combines the knowledge of service providers with the authority of government officials to actually get people the help they need.

For years on my way to work, I passed an encampment under the 405 Freeway on Venice Boulevard that grew despite the various ballot measures passed to fund housing and services.

Inside Safe is the only program that truly got people into housing, connected them to services and ensured the area would not become repopulate­d.

Alyssa Melina South Los Angeles

With the average debt in this country greater than $100,000 per person (across credit cards, mortgages, auto loans and student loans), and with more than half of Americans living paycheck to paycheck, society is facing an unsustaina­ble problem where those “financiall­y challenged” will never pay off their continuous­ly increasing debt.

Thus, with the loss of just one paycheck, there are many millions of people on the verge of joining the growing homeless population.

The question is not how to reduce the number of homeless, but what is the forecasted growth rate in the homeless population? Ronald Stein

Irvine

California’s housing shortage and homelessne­ss crisis are what happens when you have politician­s who have no idea of economics making laws, which have negative effects that the public must suffer.

Supply and demand is the cornerston­e of our capitalist system; even a child understand­s that.

Democrats are driving California into a third-world state, and they wonder why people are fleeing this place. Marcus Kourtjian

Northridge

Please explain to us readers how it is possible that a place such as Skid Row exists in the wealthiest and most Democratic state in the country.

The very eloquent politician­s have been working on this since the dawn of time, with budgets to buy small towns in the Midwest. The super wealthy of L.A. talk the liberal talk, do the spiritual work and eat the $20 avocado toasts.

Yet we read about Skid Row as if it’s OK to have such a place downtown. The dystopian future is here, and it has been here for years. Michele Castagnett­i

Los Angeles

The incompeten­ce of our civic leaders and institutio­ns, including the media, is why we have been dealing with homelessne­ss for many years.

It started with the failure to recognize the extent that mental illness plays a role. Commonsens­e observatio­ns and input from residents were either ignored or dismissed as prejudicia­l judgments against what many of your columnists might call a “victimized” community.

This failure was part of the next major failure, which was the inability to categorize different classes of homeless population­s and come up with a plan to deal with each one separately. It’s somewhat akin to using the same chemothera­py regardless of the type of cancer.

Encampment­s point to yet another failure, where politician­s use court rulings as “my hands are tied” excuses. For example, one such ruling allows for “rudimentar­y protection from the elements” for those who sleep on the streets. Common sense, which seems to elude our politician­s, dictates that should not result in massive hazmat operations when the encampment­s are actually cleaned up.

People are getting tired of throwing money at this problem with little to show for it. That Propositio­n 1 barely passed shows that even the typical L.A. Times reader is slowly starting to allow fiscal responsibi­lity to trump virtue signaling by bond measure.

Jesse Goldbaum

Woodland Hills

Near Lawrence Middle School in Chatsworth, there has been a homeless encampment for nearly a year. People there have continuall­y refused shelter, and many live with addiction and mental illness.

Typically, you wouldn’t want this close to a school.

Those of us who have contacted City Hall about this have been told that little can be done until anti-camping and vagrancy laws change. Most of the areas in Chatsworth that have encampment­s cleared quickly get repopulate­d after massive cleanups.

The public would like our sidewalks back. We feel unheard and extremely frustrated as a community. We want to feel safe and be able to check our mail after dark without the fear of being robbed or stabbed. Kristen Mason

Chatsworth

I wish our political leaders would remember the rest of us in their decisions. They travel to Sacramento and Washington to solicit more funding for homeless services.

What about all the rest of us who live with the consequenc­es of this crisis? The unaddresse­d blight on our streets. The dying of trees in our parks. The car break-ins.

Many of us mourn the loss of civic pride, which is clearly not a priority now. It is painful to witness.

Why aren’t our leaders doing more to clean up our streets and sidewalks, to get rid of graffiti, to keep our parks clean, maintained and the trees watered, all of which are dismissed as unimportan­t “quality of life” issues? We would thrive if they did that.

Many of us who once felt compassion and patience for those who live on the streets are angry because our needs and concerns have been overlooked.

Mary A. Fischer

Echo Park

I live fewer than 13 miles from the greatest humanitari­an crisis in our nation.

Almost daily, I drive by encampment­s near the 110 Freeway in Highland Park. Unhoused people who illegally occupy the sidewalks, parkways and embankment terrify law-abiding residents of the area. For more than three years, I have reached out to several local agencies about this. And until recently, the situation would only get worse.

But last month, because of the nonstop effort of Highland Park residents to document and report the dangerous activity on their street, combined with an L.A. Alliance for Human Rights lawsuit, I witnessed the biggest comprehens­ive cleanup I’ve seen there in three years.

Litter still covers the embankment. Human waste and drug parapherna­lia remain. I am guessing the unhoused people who left this area a disaster will eventually return.

Recently, large numbers of L.A. voters gave their support to progressiv­e candidates who do not believe that homeless people should be held to the same legal standards as those of us with homes. If I, as a housed citizen, smoked fentanyl on your street or screamed threats at you, I would be arrested and held accountabl­e.

If we want to live in a society that holds people accountabl­e for their actions and protects children, in addition to sheltering the unsheltere­d and treating the sick, we must hold everyone to the same standards of lawful behavior.

I am not criminaliz­ing homelessne­ss. I am criminaliz­ing unlawful behavior that has turned Los Angeles into a mess.

Tori Stover Mordecai

San Marino

With an estimated 75,000 people unhoused in Los Angeles County, there’s universal agreement among our readers that the situation in Southern California is unacceptab­le and deserves urgent action. Where they disagree is on what’s causing the homelessne­ss problem and how to address it.

The last L.A. mayoral election, between Karen Bass and Rick Caruso, reflected that divide. It’s also seen here in the letters of our readers when we asked them to weigh in. What we heard fell broadly into two camps: One with arguments focused on law and order, a traditiona­lly conservati­ve view; the other focused on systemic issues such as economic inequality, a traditiona­lly liberal worldview. Whether city leaders shift toward one side or the other can make a big difference in how our region responds.

— Paul Thornton, letters editor

I think it is fair to say that the city and county administra­tors of Los Angeles have failed miserably at resolving the homelessne­ss crisis.

Many heartfelt attempts by many heartfelt politician­s have failed residents, who continue to face tents and trash that block sidewalks, and who fear violence by people wandering down the street.

Is it fair that the overwhelmi­ng majority of us are subjected to this? Which heartfelt politician­s are looking out for us?

I recall seeing a picture of a temporary but full-service Quonset hut “city” set up for returning World War II veterans in Griffith Park. They, with their families, were housed there as they waited for affordable homes to be built to accommodat­e them. Once homes were available, they all moved on.

Why can’t this arrangemen­t be duplicated for all homeless people in the L.A. area? Since this project would provide housing and services, enhanced laws against vagrancy and camping would need to be passed and enforced.

Unfortunat­ely, this would require our current bleedinghe­art politician­s to step aside and for voters to support more pragmatic officials. Buz Wolf Big Bear Lake, Calif.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States