Los Angeles Times

Flip-flops get own screening

-

Regarding “Shoo, FlipFlops,” [Letters, June 2]: I have definitely noticed a surge in passengers wearing flip-flops ever since the Transporta­tion Security Administra­tion started requiring people to remove their shoes at screening. Perhaps they are rebelling against this cumbersome procedure. What letter writer Michael Ludmer failed to mention is important: In the event of an in-flight emergency, the last thing a passenger should be wearing is flimsy plastic sandals — highly inappropri­ate for a quick exit. For now, we are apparently stuck with the sight of cheap footwear more suitable for the beach. Kyle Kimbrell Playa del Rey It’s too bad Ludmer’s aesthetic sense is offended by flip-flops on airplanes. But why is he blaming the passengers? The TSA is the culprit here. Travelers are required to remove their shoes, and flip-flops are easy to get off and on. Stop to fuss with shoes and socks, and you’ll lose track of your other items, not to mention getting baleful stares from the people in line behind you. If Ludmer doesn’t want to look at bare feet, he should lobby the TSA for better screening devices. Bonnie Sloane Los Angeles No flip-flops on airplanes? Flip-flops are shoes (ask any restaurant) and are easy to remove for security inspection. I, a 67-yearold woman, live in flip-flops, have regular pedicures, no blisters or abscesses, no boils or bunions. I’d rather sit next to a person in flipflops with aired-out feet than someone who removes his stinky shoes to reveal dirty, sweaty socks with holes in them. Michele Burgess Huntington Beach

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States