Los Angeles Times

San Fernando saga: Affair between two council members lands in court.

- Dan.weikel@latimes.com

A federal investigat­ion has found no evidence that the Los Angeles Police Department misappropr­iated millions of dollars it was paid for providing law enforcemen­t services at Los Angeles Internatio­nal Airport, authoritie­s announced.

The Federal Aviation Administra­tion reached the conclusion after reviewing a complaint filed last year alleging that the LAPD overcharge­d the airport and used the money to bolster city coffers and pay for police services unrelated to security at LAX.

Under federal regulation­s, an airport’s revenue from landing fees, terminal rents, concession­s and other charges must be used only for airport purposes.

“We are gratified that the FAA found that our reimbursem­ents to LAPD complied with the law,” Nancy Castles, a spokeswoma­n for Los Angeles World Airports, said Thursday. “We are fully aware that using any airport-related funds for non airport purposes is considered illegal revenue diversion.”

The FAA however, found three problems that required correction. Investigat­ors said that LAPD staffers assigned to LAX kept inadequate records, made at least one billing error and used the airport-funded K-9 bomb squad to respond to calls away from LAX. For the latter violation, the city has paid the airport $1.7 million.

The complaint was filed by the Los Angeles Airport Peace Officers Assn., which represents more than 400 of- ficers from the LAX Police Department, an independen­t agency that shares law enforcemen­t duties at LAX with the LAPD.

Citing a sample of financial records, the complaint said the LAPD imposed exorbitant fees for assigning 50 to 150 full- and part-time officers a year to LAX, the thirdbusie­st airport in the nation. The documents showed, for example, that Los Angeles World Airports reimbursed the LAPD at a rate that was more than double the salaries of the officers assigned to the airport.

Los Angeles police said the billings were directly related to work the department performed at LAX. The fees, they added, are needed to pay for officer salaries, benefits, training, insurance, equipment, administra­tion and oversight, including command responsibi­lities in case of disasters.

The FAA investigat­ion was separate from another audit of LAX announced in June by the inspector general of the U.S. Department of Transporta­tion. Several members of Congress requested the audit, which will evaluate the use of about $1 billion in airport revenue and the FAA’s oversight of those funds.

Marshall McClain, president of the airport police associatio­n, said he would rather rely on the inspector general than the FAA. “Our only goal,” he said, “is to ensure that the LAX police force is adequate and has reasonable resources to provide for the safety and security of the airport and the traveling public.”

 ?? Luis Sinco
Los Angeles Times ?? A PROBE finds no evidence the LAPD misappropr­iated airport payments, but cites other problems.
Luis Sinco Los Angeles Times A PROBE finds no evidence the LAPD misappropr­iated airport payments, but cites other problems.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States