Los Angeles Times

Shell aborts its Arctic drilling plans this year

- By Ralph Vartabedia­n ralph.vartabedia­n@latimes.com

After investing an estimated $5 billion in recent years in oil exploratio­n in the offshore Alaskan Arctic, Shell announced Thursday that it would abandon any renewed drilling effort this year.

The company cited a federal appeals court decision last week that found the Interior Department had awarded permits to Shell based on inadequate informatio­n, a major triumph for environmen­tal groups that had been battling the oil giant for years.

“This is a disappoint­ing outcome, but the lack of a clear path forward means that I am not prepared to commit further resources for drilling in Alaska in 2014,” said Ben van Beurden, who took over as Royal Dutch Shell’s chief executive four weeks ago. “We will look to relevant agencies and the court to resolve their open legal issues as quickly as possible.”

The statement leaves open Shell’s option to resume Arctic exploratio­n in the future. The company has run into enormous technical and weather-related problems in the last few years, including losing control of one rig that ran aground in stormy seas. Shell also was fined $1.1 million for violating the Clean Air Act.

In announcing the decision to drop the Alaska exploratio­n this year, Van Beurden said the company’s overall expenses were too high. The firm announced a 71% drop in fourth-quarter profit Thursday.

Although the Arctic waters are thought to hold enormous reserves, the cost of exploratio­n and production is extremely high. In addition, U.S. oil production is surging in North Dakota, Colorado and Texas, bringing lower-cost oil to refineries that are much closer to big markets.

Alaska’s U.S. senators both decried the judicial ruling that forced Shell’s decision. “It is simply unacceptab­le that judicial overreach is getting in the way of letting Alaskans develop our own natural resources,” said Sen. Mark Begich (D-Alaska). “Developmen­t in the Arctic has already been subjected to unpreceden­ted safety standards — far more than domestic production anywhere else.”

But environmen­tal groups said they hoped Shell’s decision was the first step toward a total abandonmen­t of Arctic drilling.

“We are pleased to hear that Shell’s CEO has made the most reasonable decision about drilling in the Arctic this year, after the company has demonstrat­ed incompeten­ce for two years, breaching multiple health, safety and environmen­tal regulation­s,” said Greenpeace Arctic campaign leader Gustavo Ampugnani. “We are still waiting for the Obama administra­tion to cancel the lease sale, following the court ruling.”

Two other major oil companies — ConocoPhil­lips and Norway’s Statoil — that have operated in the offshore waters of Alaska have also indicated that they do not plan any exploratio­n activity in 2014. ConocoPhil­lips said its plans were on hold until the company had more certainty about regulation­s.

 ?? Tim Aubry
Greenpeace ?? SHELL’S DRILLING RIG Kulluk ran aground in 2012, one of many problems that have complicate­d the firm’s exploratio­n plans in Arctic waters off Alaska.
Tim Aubry Greenpeace SHELL’S DRILLING RIG Kulluk ran aground in 2012, one of many problems that have complicate­d the firm’s exploratio­n plans in Arctic waters off Alaska.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States