Los Angeles Times

New worker-boss bargaining chips

- By Ravi Mattu

If the hype is to be believed, you can see the future in Silicon Valley.

In that part of California, youthful geniuses start companies that change everything about how we live and do business. And, if authors Reid Hoffman, Ben Casnocha and Chris Yeh are to be believed in their new book, those companies also reveal how the relationsh­ip between employees and employers is changing.

Hoffman ought to know. As co-founder and chairman of LinkedIn, the networking site, he has been at the leading edge of changes in work for the profession­al class. The company’s logo is on the front cover of the book, “The Alliance: Managing Talent in the Networked Age.” It was published by Harvard Business Review Press.

We have moved from an “era of lifetime employment,” the authors say, to a “freeagency-style” period. They remind us that we can no longer expect to join a company and be set up with a career for life, working for the same organizati­on from school until we retire.

From their perch in Silicon Valley, where competitio­n for the brightest and best employees often seems like a blood sport, this view is a reality.

Engineers are so highly prized that not only are youthful developers able to command salaries that few entry-level employees can muster in other industries, but chief executives go to great lengths to hire them.

One founder of a wellknown start-up told me he spent four months wooing just one employee. Beyond the salary and equity being offered, he spent time with the potential recruit and his family, going so far as to drive his wife and children to football practice, all in the hope of convincing the engineer to join his start-up. (He did.)

Although the authors ac- knowledge that not all industries are evolving as fast as the tech sector, they believe many are having to cope with rapid change.

In their 2012 book, “The Start-Up of You,” Hoffman and Casnocha laid out how this affected the individual employee.

Here, they and Yeh focus on how managers should respond. The clue is in the title: “The Alliance” argues for a new relationsh­ip that is not based solely on “a legal and binding contract” between company and worker but more on a “relational approach. Think of employment as an alliance: a mutually beneficial deal, with explicit terms, between independen­t players.”

What does this mean in practice? For a start, modern employment is defined by “tours of duty,” an idea they discussed in a 2013 article for Harvard Business Review. Careers are increasing­ly a series of short, often projectbas­ed assignment­s.

There are three types of tour: Rotational, aimed at entry-level employees, structured and of “finite duration”; Transforma­tional, focused on specific task and personaliz­ed to an individual employee; and the rarer Foundation­al tour, which is when an employee and employer want a lifelong link.

Employees are as much in control of a relationsh­ip as employers, say the authors, and managers must embrace this fact.

The authors say this requires honest and continuing conversati­ons between manager and managed to define the parameters of the relationsh­ip.

This can even include accepting that valued employees may choose to leave the company — but having an open conversati­on means a manager can get the most out of them before they quit. Mattu is an editor at the Financial Times of London, in which this review first appeared.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States