Los Angeles Times

A DIVISIVE BAN

India is blocking a film about a 2012 fatal gang rape. Controvers­y swirls over the focus on an unrepentan­t convicted assailant.

- By Shashank Bengali :: reporting from mumbai, india shashank.bengali@latimes.com Twitter: @SBengali

The convicted rapist speaks of the crime in a voice that is cool, dispassion­ate — and terrifying. “A decent girl” wouldn’t have been out at 9 p.m., he says, and “a girl is far more responsibl­e for a rape than a boy.” But Mukesh Singh, one of four men sentenced to death for the gang rape and murder of a 23-year-old woman, does not stop there.

“When being raped, she shouldn’t fight back,” Singh says in the upcoming BBC documentar­y about the case, “India’s Daughter.” “She should just be silent and allow the rape.”

To many, the words were a sickening reminder of India’s struggle with sexual violence, which gained worldwide attention with that incident on a private bus in New Delhi, the capital, in December 2012.

Indian women, however, did not need to be reminded. Despite a raft of new legislatio­n and promises to crack down on perpetrato­rs, new cases of abuse or harassment still surface in the national headlines seemingly every week, illustrati­ng with dreadful clarity that Singh’s views, however vile, are shared by many Indian men.

Although some free speech advocates lamented the Indian government’s decision Wednesday to block the film from being broadcast here, many women’s organizati­ons supported the move.

Part of the backlash against the film stems from the belief that the focus on Singh, who displayed a startling lack of remorse, turns him into a convenient scapegoat for a much bigger problem. But it also reflects a growing effort by Indian women at all strata of society to take the war against sexual objectific­ation and violence into their hands.

“The filmmakers are saying that [blocking the broadcast] will silence the grim reality of rape culture in India. But there is already a very loud conversati­on in India about this grim reality,” said Kavita Krishnan, secretary of the All India Progressiv­e Women’s Assn.

“It is not limited to the Mukesh Singh interview. The rape culture lies with all of us. It lies very widely among the society at large. Reducing it to this one man and this one film is not the answer.”

Indian authoritie­s said Wednesday that they would take legal action against the filmmaker, award-winning British documentar­y producer Leslee Udwin, charging that she violated the agreement under which she was permitted to interview Singh at New Delhi’s Tihar Jail. In response, Udwin released copies of the authorizat­ion from the Ministry of Home Affairs and a letter from Singh saying he agreed to be interviewe­d.

To some, it seemed as though government officials were more troubled by the documentar­y, which they had not seen, than by the incident that led to it. The victim was assaulted repeatedly with an iron rod and a male friend was knocked unconsciou­s; both were thrown from the moving bus, and she died of her injuries two weeks later.

“The reality is [that] what the man spoke reflects the views of many men in India, and why are we shying away from that?” said Anu Aga, an Indian businesswo­man and lawmaker in the Rajya Sabha, or upper house.

Banning the movie “is not the answer,” Aga said. “We have to confront the issue that men in India do not respect women. And anytime there is a rape, blame is placed on the woman.... It is the views of many men in India.

“Let’s be aware of it, and let’s not pretend that all is well.”

Yet many activists resented the idea that a foreign-made documentar­y was needed to highlight the problem. In an online article, Krishnan criticized what she called the “white savior” aspect of the publicity campaign surroundin­g the film. Why use the word “daughter” in the title, Krishnan asks, as if India’s women are weak and unable to stand up for themselves?

Many Indian women, perhaps inspired by the outpouring of anger over the 2012 rape, are beginning to speak out about the problem on their terms, overcoming generation­s of stigma surroundin­g violations of women’s sexual rights.

In December, a woman who was raped in New Delhi by a driver for the U.S.-based Uber car service told her story to the Indian Express newspaper, saying, “This city has failed me.”

Last month, after a man allegedly groped the young woman sitting next to him on a domestic flight, she turned her cellphone camera on him, berating him in a video that went viral.

“You’re asking for forgivenes­s — why, because I’m a girl?” she asks as he holds his head in his hands. “And you have the right to touch me anytime, anywhere you want to?”

Last week, a 29-year-old woman came forward with text messages revealing chronic sexual harassment by her boss, prominent scientist Rajendra K. Pachauri, who was forced to resign from his position as head of the United Nations panel on climate change. Pachauri, 74, has denied the allegation­s.

In a statement to Indian broadcaste­r NDTV, which was due to air the film Sunday to coincide with Internatio­nal Women’s Day, filmmaker Udwin, who spent two years on the film, said she was “deeply saddened” by the ban.

“India should be embracing this film, not blocking it with a knee-jerk hysteria without even seeing it,” Udwin said. “This was an opportunit­y for India to continue to show the world how much has changed since this heinous crime.”

Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s conservati­ve government acted swiftly on the issue, perhaps looking for a way to curry favor with liberal groups that have opposed many of his policies. Rajnath Singh, minister of home affairs and no relation to the convicted rapist, said that he was “personally hurt” by Mukesh Singh’s comments and that the government “will not allow any attempt by any individual, group or organizati­on to leverage such unfortunat­e incidents for commercial benefit.”

“The respect and dignity of women constitute a core value of our culture and traditions,” the home minister told lawmakers.

But authoritie­s were facing criticism for allowing the interview to take place, given that Singh and the other three convicts have pleaded not guilty and are appealing their death sentences. Before the trial, Singh’s brother, who was also accused in the incident, hanged himself in his cell with a bedsheet, prompting allegation­s of negligence against the prison.

Krishnan, of the women’s associatio­n, and others said the Home Affairs Ministry was “irresponsi­ble” for allowing the prisoner to incriminat­e himself.

“There is a judicial process underway. The film should not be screened in a manner that will vitiate this process,” she said. “No one is wishing the film away.”

‘India should be embracing this film, not blocking it with a knee-jerk hysteria.’

— Leslee Udwin,

producer of banned documentar­y, “India’s Daughter”

 ?? Piyal Adhikary European Pressphoto Agency ?? ACTIVISTS GATHER
at a demonstrat­ion in the Indian city of Kolkata demanding capital punishment for a convicted rapist.
Piyal Adhikary European Pressphoto Agency ACTIVISTS GATHER at a demonstrat­ion in the Indian city of Kolkata demanding capital punishment for a convicted rapist.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States