Los Angeles Times

America’s local renaissanc­e

Washington’s stalemated but that doesn’t mean the nation has lost its capacity for self-renewal.

- Ronald Brownstein is a senior writer at the National Journal. Rbrownstei­n @nationaljo­urnal.com RONALD BROWNSTEIN

Not many ideas draw agreement anymore from solid majorities of Democrats, Republican­s and independen­ts. But here’s one: Across party lines, most Americans believe that progress on the biggest challenges facing the country is more likely to come from local rather than national institutio­ns.

In the latest Allstate/National Journal Heartland Monitor Poll, released this week, Americans were asked whether they believed “new ideas and solutions” for responding to “the biggest economic and social challenges facing America” were more likely to emerge from “state and local institutio­ns” like “government, businesses, and volunteer or community organizati­ons,” or from “national institutio­ns like the federal government, national businesses, and major nonprofit organizati­ons.”

Almost four-fifths of Republican­s and nearly three-fourths of independen­ts picked local institutio­ns. Not surprising­ly, with their party holding the White House, Democrats were somewhat more inclined to look to national institutio­ns for answers; but, even so, a solid 56% of them expected local institutio­ns to produce the best new thinking.

Public perception doesn’t always match reality. But these opinions track a potentiall­y transforma­tive shift.

If the decades around World War II were the glory days for big government and big business, the past generation has mostly witnessed their decline. America’s largest companies have shown a renewed capacity for innovation and have become global leaders in the digital economy. But despite some admirable exceptions, they are not producing the growing job opportunit­ies, much less the rising living standards, that American workers once considered routine.

The political scene is even darker. More often than not, over the last two decades, Washington has been mired in stalemate. Even against that backdrop of limited accomplish­ment, all signs indicate that the nation’s capital is now careening into an especially dysfunctio­nal period. Congressio­nal Republican­s and President Obama are deadlocked on virtually every significan­t question. The stunning letter from GOP senators this week attempting to undercut Obama’s nuclear negotiatio­ns with Iran — following the House Republican effort to do the same by enlisting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu — extends partisan conflict directly into diplomacy to an ominous extent. Add in the frenzy over Hillary Rodham Clinton’s illadvised but hardly unique decision to use personal email in public office, and all the ingredient­s are assembled for a Washington meltdown.

It’s easy to conclude from the failings at the pinnacle of business and government that America has lost its capacity for self-renewal. But that would be wrong. The United States is still producing dynamic responses to its greatest needs, from creating jobs to reviving troubled neighborho­ods.

What has changed is the locus of the action. Although this is often overshadow­ed by the national stalemate, the United States today is living through a golden age of local initiative. Driven by frustratio­n with the national deadlock, enabled by new communicat­ions technology and inspired by an ethos of direct action, a new generation of grassroots problem-solvers is forging fresh answers to familiar challenges in communitie­s large and small.

For more than a year, the Next Economy project, a joint effort by National Journal and the Atlantic, has been profiling dozens of these activists. Later this year, they will present the best of them with their first annual Renewal Awards. (You can nominate promising programs for the competitio­n at www.RenewalAwa­rds.com.)

The innovators leading this revival include creative and committed young people such as Clara Brenner, the co-founder of a business accelerato­r called Tumml. Her group provides funding and mentoring for startup companies that want to tackle civic challenges, such as combating homelessne­ss or improving transporta­tion.

“You open TechCrunch or the Wall Street Journal, and you read about start-ups changing the world through the next dating app or on-demand butler service,” she told me recently. “It’s pretty dishearten­ing. We wanted to see more start-ups solving real problems.”

Some innovators are operating from big companies: Stanley Litow, the president of the IBM Foundation, has pioneered the rapidly expanding P-TECH program, which links high school, community college and on-the-job training from employers to provide young people with marketable skills. Others work from nonprofit organizati­ons such as Cure Violence, which recruits former convicts to mediate local disputes and to help break the cycle of violence in inner-city neighborho­ods.

These programs differ in their scale, structure and areas of emphasis. But they all reflect Americans’ growing willingnes­s to directly confront problems that earlier generation­s might have waited for Washington to address. Most of these civic entreprene­urs recognize that the federal government is often the best lever to expand the scale of good ideas. Yet they aren’t expecting much near-term assistance from a capital paralyzed by partisan conflict. “We are on our own — that’s the way we look at it,” Peter Kenney, co-founder of the Colorado group Civic Results, told me this week.

The ongoing resurgence of grass-roots initiative is an impulse that does not yet know it is a movement. But community by community, often block by block, it is already revitalizi­ng America.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States