Los Angeles Times

Cuba may lose ‘terrorism’ tag

Obama says he will make the decision after federal agencies review a report.

- BY MICHAEL A. MEMOLI AND CHRISTI PARSONS michael.memoli@latimes.com christi.parsons@latimes.com Memoli reported from Panama City and Parsons from Washington.

Removing it from a U.S. list of state sponsors of terrorism would be a key step in formalizin­g a policy change toward Havana.

PANAMA CITY — President Obama said Thursday that his State Department had finished a review of whether to remove Cuba from the list of state sponsors of terrorism, potentiall­y the first step in formally changing U.S. policy toward the island nation at a time of warming diplomatic relations.

Speaking to reporters after meeting with Jamaica’s prime minister in Kingston, the Jamaican capital, Obama said several federal agencies will look at the report before it is given to him.

Obama will review the secretary of State’s recommenda­tion and get the views of his national security team, then decide whether to lift the designatio­n, an aide said late Thursday. Obama has said he will act quickly. If he decides to take Cuba off the list, the aide said, the president will submit a report to Congress at least 45 days before the proposed change would take effect.

Obama did not say what the recommenda­tion was, though he hinted of progress toward improved relations.

Obama and Cuban President Raul Castro made a historic announceme­nt in December that their nations would end half a century without diplomatic relations. The two sides have been working since to reestablis­h ties and are likely to meet informally this week at a summit in Panama.

“We want to make sure that, given that this is a powerful tool to isolate those countries that genuinely do support terrorism, that when we make those designatio­ns we’ve got strong evidence that, in fact, that’s the case,” Obama told reporters. “And as circumstan­ces change, then that list will change as well.”

Since 1982, Cuba has been on the list of countries determined by the State Department to have repeatedly provided support for acts of internatio­nal terrorism. The designatio­n carries sanctions, including bans on U.S. foreign assistance, defense exports and sales, as well as controls on the exports of some goods and financial restrictio­ns. Iran, Sudan and Syria are also on the list.

Cuba has said the terrorism designatio­n is a major obstacle to reaching an agreement, and White House officials have not ruled out the possibilit­y of changing it while the president is in Panama.

Presidenti­al aides did not disclose what the State Department recommende­d, but one noted that North Korea, which President George W. Bush removed from the list in 2008, defies internatio­nal attempts to contain its rogue nuclear program. By contrast, Cuba is talking with the U.S. about adopting reforms. The aides requested anonymity to discuss the issue before Obama announces his decision.

A decision to end the “sponsor of terrorism” designatio­n would face bipartisan opposition in Congress. However, lawmakers would have few effective tools to counter it, and Democratic congressio­nal staffers question whether Republican­s could come up with enough votes to reject the initiative.

In a statement Wednesday, Sen. Robert Menendez (D-N.J.), until recently the top Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said it would be “another significan­t misstep in a misguided policy.”

But Rep. Jim McGovern (D-Mass.), a leading critic of the previous U.S. policy of isolating Cuba, said it would add momentum to the process of normalizin­g relations.

“They don’t belong on the terrorist list; they never did. But nonetheles­s, we politicize the terror list and put them on,” he said.

Analysts say the change in designatio­n would broadcast a loud message as Obama arrives for the summit of Latin American states, announcing to leaders that he is intent on turning the page on Cold War relations between the U.S. and the region.

Not incidental­ly, it might also have the effect of drowning out expected criticism, particular­ly from Venezuela, that U.S. imperialis­m is still a fearsome force in Latin America.

“The Venezuelan­s are trying to redirect attention away from a lot of the problems they have with human rights, the failing economy, the toxic political situation,” said Carl Meacham, a former Senate Foreign Relations Committee staffer who directs the Americas program at the Center for Strategic and Internatio­nal Studies.

“The only way you can drown out the Venezuelan narrative is to do something big,” Meacham said. “Go big or go home.”

In a meeting Thursday in Jamaica with young leaders, Obama said he fully expected to continue having difference­s with the Cuban government, but not in a way that would keep both sides “imprisoned by the past.”

“We are as committed as ever to supporting human rights and political freedom in Cuba and around the world. But I believe that engagement is a more powerful force than isolation, and the changes we are making can help improve the lives of the Cuban people.”

 ?? Carolyn Cole Los Angeles Times ?? A SIGN in Mariel, Cuba, says, “... and I will be on the front line, to die fighting in defense of my nation.” Military service is mandatory for young Cubans.
Carolyn Cole Los Angeles Times A SIGN in Mariel, Cuba, says, “... and I will be on the front line, to die fighting in defense of my nation.” Military service is mandatory for young Cubans.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States