Los Angeles Times

More guns? No. Try gun control.

-

Re “Armed and safer,” Opinion, July 20

Bob Owens describes the recent carnage at military facilities in Tennessee and elsewhere. His solution is to arm the senior officers and noncommiss­ioned officers with handguns at all military installati­ons.

Owens says that “every military recruit has had basic weapons training.” Well, I was in the Army and I had weapons training, but I was never taught to deal with masses of civilians; that’s covered in police training.

Owens doesn’t mention the one rational solution: no guns. America has to get rid of guns — no hunting, no target practice, no manufactur­e and no sales. Change the 2nd Amendment. This may take a long time, but if we had started when President Kennedy was shot, we’d be a lot closer to a rational, compassion­ate society.

The United States has tried open carry, inept background checks and allowing assault weapons. It hasn’t worked. Let’s try getting rid of guns.

John R. Shiban

Westlake Village

Owens makes a wellreason­ed argument for allowing officers to carry loaded weapons on military installati­ons.

Military training and discipline, together with the naturally closed and limited nature of these sites, make it unlikely that these personnel would misbehave or prove incompeten­t in the ways that concern those of us who are opposed to arming, for example, kindergart­en teachers.

Furthermor­e, it is sadly true that we can expect to see another assault on a military site. Arming officers would be a useful way to test whether welltraine­d personnel could effectivel­y defend themselves against a surprise attack.

Geoff Kuenning

Claremont

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States