Los Angeles Times

Jury rules in first part of Holmes’ sentencing

- By Maria L. La Ganga

The same jury that found James E. Holmes guilty of murdering a dozen people during a midnight screening of “The Dark Knight Rises” in Aurora, Colo., ruled Thursday that he acted in an especially cruel manner when he blasted his way through the multiplex.

Jurors, who also found that Holmes lay in wait and ambushed his victims, decided that the gunman did not go to the crowded theater intending to kill children — one of the five aggravatin­g factors that could lead to a death penalty.

Over and over in the quiet courtroom, Judge Carlos A. Samour Jr. intoned the jury’s verdicts as he named each of the 12 people Holmes killed three years ago:

“We the jury do unanimousl­y find that the prosecutio­n has proven beyond a reasonable doubt the existence of at least one of the alleged aggravatin­g factors with respect to this count of murder in the first degree,” Samour said. “Part B reflects that the jury has found that all four of the aggravatin­g factors alleged by the prosecutio­n with respect to this count have been proven by the prosecutio­n beyond a reasonable doubt.”

Holmes was convicted on July 16 of 165 counts, including first-degree murder and attempted murder, in the July 20, 2012, rampage.

The sentencing phase began Wednesday, with prosecutor­s arguing that Holmes should be found guilty of five aggravatin­g factors when he murdered eight men, three women and a girl who had just finished kindergart­en.

The factors were that he killed more than two people; that he intentiona­lly killed a child younger than 12; that he knowingly created a “grave risk of death” for others beyond the people he killed; that he acted in an especially heinous, cruel or depraved manner; and that he lay in wait and ambushed his victims.

After less than a full day of deliberati­on, the jurors agreed he was guilty of four of those circumstan­ces.

During the trial itself, jurors saw 22 hours of video interviews, during which the gunman told a court-appointed psychiatri­st that he did not want to kill children.

“I tried to minimize child fatalities. I chose the night showing,” Holmes said in the video. “It was sad that a child had died.... It wasn’t my intention to kill children or leave them parentless or that stuff.”

But as Holmes sprayed the Century 16 multiplex with gunfire, Veronica Moser-Sullivan, 6, was killed, and the packed theater was filled with other children.

“The evidence shows you that the defendant had the conscious objective to kill everyone in the theater, man, woman and child alike,” prosecutor Richard Orman told the jurors.

The jury did not agree, apparently swayed by Holmes’ protests that children were not his intended targets.

As soon as the first part of the penalty phase was over, the second part began, with defense attorneys presenting evidence of mitigating factors. If jurors agree there are mitigating factors, then a third part of the sentencing phase begins, with jurors weighing the aggravatin­g factors against the mitigating ones to decide whether Holmes should live or die.

maria.laganga @latimes.com

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States